I have a statement to make about our compressor map and the larger questions of our marketing communications.
The point of contention is pretty clear cut: Is our F23 compressor map a fake or isn't it? My response up until now has been to simply say the map is accurate, and we have documentation to verify that. But the ongoing questions about the map's origins uncover a problem. The testing we did which resulted in that map was not the same type of testing used to create the comparative maps also listed on our site. And so while our test data were accurate and truthful, it was a mistake to publish that map in the context of others which were tested using different methods. How the map was generated, whether in Photoshop or something else isn't the issue. I also now see that stubbornly standing by the accuracy of our test results isn't addressing this. It is that the research methods we used do not meet the standard for a publishable compressor map.
I acknowledge that our compressor map needs to be withdrawn. For people to have faith in my products, they should rightly expect information from us that's clear-cut and unequivocal. So going forward we will not publish this or any other compressor map, and will instead restrict ourselves to the data and test results we've collected over the F23's years of service.
I apologize for the controversy this has caused. I especially hate knowing that my mistake has shaken the tremendous support given me by the community in this forum and elsewhere. If anyone would like to have more information/explanation, I will do my best to deliver it.
Thanks
Doug Harper
FrankenTurbo
Bookmarks