
Originally Posted by
LakeTahoeQuattr
Probably larger to accommodate for the oil cooler I must assume?..Does make me wonder. AR had an oil cooler on the radiator for manual as well, a different radiator.
My guess yes. I thought about it this weekend I should have (just reinstalled it and filled coolant :( ) attempted to check the volume of them.
I kept the auto radiator because I figured even if it holds similar volume that the mass of the unused portion of the trans cooler should hopefully result in the radiator being more efficient.
This thread had my trying to find coolant capacities, sometimes VW/Audi listed different ones for manuals for vs autos if they were different enough but I couldn't find anything. What I did find interesting was the 2.8 A6 had a higher coolant capacity by 1 or 2 (blanking now) liters when looking at the 2001 (oops 2001 typed 2003 first) capacity chart. This has me really curious about the radiator on those and want to check one out. The engines should hold roughly the same as I can't imagine the blocks would hold 1 or 2 liters difference with any reinforcements, heatercore and basic coolant hoses would be similar. There would in theory be less volume on the 2.8 vs the 2.7t for the lines going to the turbo which would lead me to the radiator being substantially different. Why they would go smaller on the turbo car I don't know so maybe the capacity chart was wrong but I'll try to look into it when I Get a chance.
Bookmarks