
Originally Posted by
Silver streak
You may have this problem because you have the LSD rear end as-well as the 4:1 center diff.? I don't know what your talking about, as I and other people that have this mod have mentioned there is no down side. I live in a high rise and park in P 4, four floors down, no shudder, as smooth as silk. I have had this mod for over a year I think I would of heard or felt something if there was any issues with the 4:1 center diff.
A rear LSD does exacerbate the infamous Torsen "shudder" but certainly isn't the cause of it. The phenonemon is very well documented and a side-effect of the Torsen's basic design. Here's why: The Torsen center diff varies the torque split between the front and rear wheels by limiting the difference in rotational speed between the front and rear driveshafts.
When a car goes around a corner, the front wheels travel a longer distance than the rear wheels. With an AWD car, this requires the front driveshaft to rotate faster than the rear driveshaft. Whereas an open center diff can fully accomodate a difference in the driveshafts' rotational speeds but always splits torque 50-50 between the front and rear wheels, and a locked center diff can't accomodate any difference in rotational speeds but can split torque 100-0-100 and everywhere in between, the Torsen center diff behaves like a hybrid of the two: It's never fully "open" (which is why it can vary the torque split between the front and rear wheels over a limited range) and never fully "locked" (which is why it can accomodate some percentage difference in rotational speeds between the front and rear driveshafts).
The "shudder" people experience when making a tight turn under low power (and the car must be under power because a Torsen diff behaves like an open diff when it's not, which is why it works with ABS and a locked diff doesn't) happens because
the Torsen doesn't differeniate at all until the bias-ratio reaches its limit. Read that sentence again, very carefully, as it's critical to understanding exactly how a Torsen does what it does and most people find the Torsen's operation to be counterintuitive (in other words, they assume it behaves like an open diff until it partially locks whereas it actually behaves like a locked diff until it partially opens).
Here's how a Torsen works: Torque from the engine causes the gears inside (half of which are connected to the front driveshaft, half of which are connected to the rear driveshaft, and all of which are in-mesh with each other) to jam together as the front and rear driveshafts attempt to rotate at different speeds, almost -- but not quite -- locking up solid until one of the driveshafts overcomes the gears' resistance to rotation (i.e., the designed bias-ratio is reached) and they begin to rotate at different speeds.
Because the Torsen center diff can accomodate only a limited difference in rotational speed between the two driveshafts (which is how it maintains the torque split at the bias-ratio), the speed at which each wheel is forced to rotate doesn't necessarily match the speed at which it's rolling across the road surface. Of the four, the inside rear wheel travels the shortest distance and is the least heavily loaded; as such, it's generally the wheel that's forced to compensate for the rotational/longitudinal speed mis-match by slipping and/or being dragged across the surface, and it's this that is the cause of the "shudder" many people (but apparently not you) experience. The reason this effect is not more apparent than it is, is because the engine usually isn't making very much torque at these speeds, hence the gears inside the Torsen aren't jammed together very tightly.
That said, there are several reasons why the shudder is more apparent under low power/low speeds than high power/high speeds, the foremost of which is the fact that at low power/low speeds, the car isn't cornering very hard and the load on the inside rear wheel is high because very little of it has been transferred to the other three wheels. Combined with the low power, this means the inside rear tire is dragged more than it slips or spins. Then there's also the fact that at low speeds, the tires' slip angles are generally small and the percentage difference between the average slip angle of the front tires and rear tires is at its greatest. However, as the slip angles increase in response to the increased amount of torque being developed at the tires, the percentage difference between the average slip angle of the front and rear tires decreases, reducing the (effective) difference in the distances traveled by the front and rear wheels and in turn, reducing the rotational/longitudinal speed mismatch at the inside rear wheel/tire that's the cause of the shudder.
To increase the Torsen's bias-ratio -- from the OEM setting of 66-34-66 (~2:1) to say, 80-20-80 (4:1) -- you simply make the gears jam together tighter, increasing the internal friction that resists differentiation, and thus cause it to behave even more like a locked center diff. The tradeoff, though, is that the more you make a Torsen behave like a locked diff -- and this includes performing Stasis' high-bias mod -- the less it behaves like an open diff. In other words, by increasing the bias-ratio, you're also _reducing_ the Torsen's ability to accomodate differences in the rotational speeds of the front and rear driveshafts. [I won't go into it here, but if you think about it, you'll see that, when under power and with all other things being equal, the Torsen biases the torque split to the rear wheels whenever the steering wheel is turned away from straight ahead and toward the front wheels whenever it's turned back ... ponder the implications of how _that_ might affect a car's behavior while going around corners, especially if you also keep the power on by left-foot braking!]
As an aside, it's interesting to note that with its first generation of Torsen-equipped cars (Type 44 chassis), Audi set the bias-ratio at ~3.5:1 (78-22-78) versus the 2:1 that it used with the B5 chassis A4 and S4 models. It's not known whether this reduction in the bias-ratio was done to address NVH issues or performance/safety concerns -- some people believe the higher bias-ratio resulted in quirky handling with the Type 44 chassis under certain conditions (aka as the "Spider Bite" phenomenon) -- but there's no doubt that it did reduce the amount of shuddering people experience.
Anyway, the bottom line is that what you gain on one side of the equation, you lose on the other, and faced with this decision, Audi revised its initial stance with its later cars, and chose to set the Torsen's bias-ratio low enough so that most people never experience any shudder whatsoever, even if that also meant settling for a less than optimal bias-ratio so far as outright performance was concerned.
Bookmarks