I know US didn't get the 2.4 but it looks like they have roughly 2mm wider ports than 2.8 heads, I measured every port and the sizes were within .5mm.
Even though the 2.4 has wider ports the 2.8 still had higher lift cams.
2.7
Intake port: 43x28mm
In.P cross-section: 1035mm^2
Exhaust port: 36mm
Ex.P cross-section: 1018mm^2
Surface area gain: RS4 (16%)
Intake Cam: 7.6mm
Exhaust cam: 10mm
2.4
Intake port: 56x27mm
In.P cross-section: 1355mm^2
Surface area gain: 2.8 (4.5%) & 2.7 (23.6%)
Exhaust port: 36mm
Ex.P cross-section: 1018mm^2
Surface area gain: RS4 (16%)
Intake Cam: 8.4mm
Exhaust cam: 10mm
2.8
Intake port: 54.5x26mm
In.P cross-section: 1293mm^2
Surface area gain: 2.7 (20%)
Exhaust port: 36mm
Ex.P cross-section: 1018mm^2
Surface area gain: RS4 (16%)
Intake Cam: 8.6mm
Exhaust cam: 10mm
Rs4
Intake port: 56x27mm
In.P cross-section: 1355mm^2
Surface area gain: 2.8 (4.5%) & 2.7 (23.6%)
Exhaust port: 33mm
Ex.P cross-section: 855mm^2
Intake Cam: 8.4mm
Exhaust cam: 10mm
I've never seen a post that actually puts this info into one post. If there is more info on the rs4 heads please chime in.
Updated info on RS4 heads and added Surface area and percentage gains of each port.
I took the width measurements at shortest points to get a more accurate surface area but max width of the port excluding 2.7 is 1mm larger at the dip. (Pictures give perspective)







Sent from my SM-A546E using Audizine Forum mobile app
Bookmarks