Audizine - An Automotive Enthusiast Community

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 71 of 71
  1. #41
    Veteran Member Four Rings Jayz691's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 21 2018
    AZ Member #
    412818
    My Garage
    2005 Subaru Legacy GT
    Location
    frackville, pa US

    Guest-only advertisement. Register or Log In now!
    Wasa also has a solid sprocket setup, so you can keep your balance shaft, but eliminate the weak point (the dampened sprocket). I'm doing one or the other, just haven't decided which one. Prob freewheel, since shipping time from Sweden is prob a few weeks. If everything is in good shape, with no play, I would prob prefer the solid design, and keep the balance shaft. But problem is, I won't know till I pull it apart. And can't have my car down for weeks. And the solid sprocket will add some stress to the chain, so obviously replace chain and tensioner while there. Which would do either way really. Any opinions on this? Not planning on going BT or anything, so not gonna have crazy power or rpms. That may make a difference.

    Sent from my LM-G710VM using Audizine mobile app

  2. #42
    Veteran Member Four Rings Charles.waite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 27 2011
    AZ Member #
    77478
    Location
    Seattle, WA

    That’s an interesting idea. I’m curious how much the removing the decoupled sprocket will affect things.
    -CP
    2008 2.0t S-Line Ti 6MT Avant
    2017 Q7 3.0t
    SOLD -- 2012 Q5 2.0t - Stock Mommy Missile with new timing chains
    Former USP CLUB MEMBER #136
    2004 A4 1.8TQ 6MT USP - APR Stage 1+ - FSI Coils - BKR7EIX-11 - B6S4 Front + B7A4 Rear Brakes - 034 Street Trans Mount
    SOLD -- 2006 A4 2.0TQ Avant Tiptronic

  3. #43
    Veteran Member Four Rings Jayz691's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 21 2018
    AZ Member #
    412818
    My Garage
    2005 Subaru Legacy GT
    Location
    frackville, pa US

    Quote Originally Posted by Charles.waite View Post
    That’s an interesting idea. I’m curious how much the removing the decoupled sprocket will affect things.
    Addresses the weak point, being the sprocket. But the dampened sprocket it to lower stress on the chain. But with new chain, id think it would be fine. But would like to know some how. But I guess it would be like any other chain with normal sprocket??

    Sent from my LM-G710VM using Audizine mobile app

  4. #44
    Veteran Member Four Rings rongeur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 04 2011
    AZ Member #
    76443
    Location
    Clayton, CA

    I never had the sense the decoupled sprocket was the failure point. The failed pumps I have seen were due to seized balance shafts presumably due to inadequate oil levels / changes.


    Sent from my iPhone using Audizine
    2008 A4 2.0T Quattro 6MT S-Line QGM
    Stage 3 JHM TD05H-R on a fully built motor
    Build Thread

  5. #45
    Established Member Two Rings BSTD_B7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 21 2018
    AZ Member #
    434272
    My Garage
    MK1 TT 225 Roadster
    Location
    Maine

    Quote Originally Posted by rongeur View Post
    I never had the sense the decoupled sprocket was the failure point. The failed pumps I have seen were due to seized balance shafts presumably due to inadequate oil levels / changes.


    Sent from my iPhone using Audizine
    Agreed, everything I’ve heard/seen has been that the shafts seize & on occasion the seized shafts cause the bolt on the pinion to shear off


    Big Turbo B7
    MK1 TT 225 Roadster
    Owner, Euros of New England INC.

  6. #46
    Veteran Member Four Rings Jayz691's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 21 2018
    AZ Member #
    412818
    My Garage
    2005 Subaru Legacy GT
    Location
    frackville, pa US

    I believe the tdi has the failures on shafts themselves, and tfsi is the sprocket. But thats just what ive heard from people with the issue. But matbe its both. Thats even what the replacement sprockets were designed for. Thats why they offer a solid and freewheel. But like I said, just going by what I heard. But how exactly do the shafts seize up? Curious now...

    Sent from my LM-G710VM using Audizine mobile app

  7. #47
    Veteran Member Four Rings rongeur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 04 2011
    AZ Member #
    76443
    Location
    Clayton, CA

    Lack of oil in sump is probably the most likely cause. The engine I bought off of eBay a few years back for the block came as oil pump failure. The pump was heavily varnished, seized balance shaft , snapped chain and a sheared torx bolt.


    Sent from my iPhone using Audizine
    2008 A4 2.0T Quattro 6MT S-Line QGM
    Stage 3 JHM TD05H-R on a fully built motor
    Build Thread

  8. #48
    Veteran Member Four Rings Charles.waite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 27 2011
    AZ Member #
    77478
    Location
    Seattle, WA

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayz691 View Post
    I believe the tdi has the failures on shafts themselves, and tfsi is the sprocket. But thats just what ive heard from people with the issue. But matbe its both. Thats even what the replacement sprockets were designed for. Thats why they offer a solid and freewheel. But like I said, just going by what I heard. But how exactly do the shafts seize up? Curious now...

    Sent from my LM-G710VM using Audizine mobile app
    Well it sorta depends on how you define “failure”. The sprocket can shear off but that’s generally because the balance shafts wear so badly, oil pressure to them gets really bad and then one of them seizes and the chain snaps the gear off. I don’t think I’ve heard of one instance where the sprocket itself was the failure point and there were no other failure signs in the pump or balance shafts.

    I mean yea it could happen, I guess. But it’s not a weak point at all. The idea of replacing the sprocket with a solid one is still interesting of course. But hardly addressing an inherent weakness in the balance shafts.
    -CP
    2008 2.0t S-Line Ti 6MT Avant
    2017 Q7 3.0t
    SOLD -- 2012 Q5 2.0t - Stock Mommy Missile with new timing chains
    Former USP CLUB MEMBER #136
    2004 A4 1.8TQ 6MT USP - APR Stage 1+ - FSI Coils - BKR7EIX-11 - B6S4 Front + B7A4 Rear Brakes - 034 Street Trans Mount
    SOLD -- 2006 A4 2.0TQ Avant Tiptronic

  9. #49
    Veteran Member Four Rings Jayz691's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 21 2018
    AZ Member #
    412818
    My Garage
    2005 Subaru Legacy GT
    Location
    frackville, pa US

    Quote Originally Posted by Charles.waite View Post
    Well it sorta depends on how you define “failure”. The sprocket can shear off but that’s generally because the balance shafts wear so badly, oil pressure to them gets really bad and then one of them seizes and the chain snaps the gear off. I don’t think I’ve heard of one instance where the sprocket itself was the failure point and there were no other failure signs in the pump or balance shafts.

    I mean yea it could happen, I guess. But it’s not a weak point at all. The idea of replacing the sprocket with a solid one is still interesting of course. But hardly addressing an inherent weakness in the balance shafts.
    Ok, well either way, the freewheel will take care of it. Think you just made my decision for me, lol.

    Sent from my LM-G710VM using Audizine mobile app

  10. #50
    Veteran Member Four Rings Charles.waite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 27 2011
    AZ Member #
    77478
    Location
    Seattle, WA

    If you’re fine with more vibrations it’s a good solution. Just be forewarned the engine will run tougher, like a 1.8t but a little bit more since it’s got larger pistons and thus more reciprocating mass.

    Definitely not the end of the world but just wanted to clarify that there are material downsides to deleting the balance shaft function. Let us know how it goes though! Most of the guys who have done it have done it in the process of a larger build and really can’t offer back to back type of impressions because they’d had their car non-driveable for months or years so they couldn’t really offer a back to back comparison of the NVH increase from balance shaft delete.
    -CP
    2008 2.0t S-Line Ti 6MT Avant
    2017 Q7 3.0t
    SOLD -- 2012 Q5 2.0t - Stock Mommy Missile with new timing chains
    Former USP CLUB MEMBER #136
    2004 A4 1.8TQ 6MT USP - APR Stage 1+ - FSI Coils - BKR7EIX-11 - B6S4 Front + B7A4 Rear Brakes - 034 Street Trans Mount
    SOLD -- 2006 A4 2.0TQ Avant Tiptronic

  11. #51
    Veteran Member Four Rings Jayz691's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 21 2018
    AZ Member #
    412818
    My Garage
    2005 Subaru Legacy GT
    Location
    frackville, pa US

    Quote Originally Posted by Charles.waite View Post
    If you’re fine with more vibrations it’s a good solution. Just be forewarned the engine will run tougher, like a 1.8t but a little bit more since it’s got larger pistons and thus more reciprocating mass.

    Definitely not the end of the world but just wanted to clarify that there are material downsides to deleting the balance shaft function. Let us know how it goes though! Most of the guys who have done it have done it in the process of a larger build and really can’t offer back to back type of impressions because they’d had their car non-driveable for months or years so they couldn’t really offer a back to back comparison of the NVH increase from balance shaft delete.
    There are tons of people that have done it on the FB groups I'm in. Everyone ive talked to said there has been no noticable difference. Are you talking from experience of doing it before, or just what you think will be the outcome?? And what would your solution be, in your opinion? I'm mean, from your comments up above, you never even heard of the freewheel before?? Ive been following people doing it for over a year. Its very popular in UK and other countries over the pond from me.

    Sent from my LM-G710VM using Audizine mobile app

  12. #52
    Veteran Member Four Rings Charles.waite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 27 2011
    AZ Member #
    77478
    Location
    Seattle, WA

    USP balance shaft delete kit

    I used to own a b6 1.8t and the b7 was my wife’s car. The b6 was running as perfect as one could hope and it was noticeably rougher than the b7 at idle and cruising (though cruising was barely noticeable). It’s not “no difference at all”, not by a long shot. Whether you care or not is what matters.

    And the only real difference between the 1.8t and 2.0t that would affect this is the balance shafts, the 1.8t has none.

    Again it’s absolutely not the end of the world, however in my opinion it’s not worth it to delete them. Plenty of others would disagree, and that’s totally cool. Some people genuinely don’t care about NVH, I sorta do.

    What would my solution be? To what? Pumps fail because of many reasons, the sprocket shearing off is not a root cause, it’s a cascade effect of another failure.

    If your balance shafts are failing but you don’t want to splash out a million dollars on a new pump (very understandable) then the freewheel is a great idea. I plan on installing some stuffer drivetrain mounts so that’s going to amplify the vibrations so having the balance shafts should keep that mostly in check.
    Last edited by Charles.waite; 03-30-2020 at 09:37 AM.
    -CP
    2008 2.0t S-Line Ti 6MT Avant
    2017 Q7 3.0t
    SOLD -- 2012 Q5 2.0t - Stock Mommy Missile with new timing chains
    Former USP CLUB MEMBER #136
    2004 A4 1.8TQ 6MT USP - APR Stage 1+ - FSI Coils - BKR7EIX-11 - B6S4 Front + B7A4 Rear Brakes - 034 Street Trans Mount
    SOLD -- 2006 A4 2.0TQ Avant Tiptronic

  13. #53
    Veteran Member Four Rings Jayz691's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 21 2018
    AZ Member #
    412818
    My Garage
    2005 Subaru Legacy GT
    Location
    frackville, pa US

    Quote Originally Posted by Charles.waite View Post
    I used to own a b6 1.8t and the b7 was my wife’s car. The b6 was running as perfect as one could hope and it was noticeably rougher than the b7 at idle and cruising (though cruising was barely noticeable). It’s not “no difference at all”, not by a long shot. Whether you care or not is what matters.

    And the only real difference between the 1.8t and 2.0t that would affect this is the balance shafts, the 1.8t has none.

    Again it’s absolutely not the end of the world, however in my opinion it’s not worth it to delete them. Plenty of others would disagree, and that’s totally cool. Some people genuinely don’t care about NVH, I sorta do.

    What would my solution be? To what? Pumps fail because of many reasons, the sprocket shearing off is not a root cause, it’s a cascade effect of another failure.

    If your balance shafts are failing but you don’t want to splash out a million dollars on a new pump (very understandable) then the freewheel is a great idea. I plan on installing some stuffer drivetrain mounts so that’s going to amplify the vibrations so having the balance shafts should keep that mostly in check.
    So your just comparing it to how a 1.8t feels?? That don't sound very scientific. I made a post on tfsi tuning group on FB. Quite a few people have done the freewheel on there. Some say no difference. 1 or 2 said minimal, if any. So seems like a good way ta go. Another guy on my b7 group I chat with a lot, just got his in. So maybe I'll wait till je installs it, ta see what his results are. Wouldnt be a bad idea to get a fluiddamper, if they weren't so damm expensive..maybe I'll put one on the list.

    Sent from my LM-G710VM using Audizine mobile app

  14. #54
    Veteran Member Four Rings Jayz691's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 21 2018
    AZ Member #
    412818
    My Garage
    2005 Subaru Legacy GT
    Location
    frackville, pa US

    Quote Originally Posted by BSTD_B7 View Post
    That being said if anyone wants to do the VIS balance shaft delete I’ll do 160 shipped in the U.S. just paid 230$ for it literally last week


    Big Turbo B7
    MK1 TT 225 Roadster
    Are you still considering selling the VIS freewheel? I'm about to order the Wasa one, $150/ delivered. But if you are selling your, I'll give you my money instead. Lmk.

    Sent from my LM-G710VM using Audizine mobile app

  15. #55
    Veteran Member Four Rings Charles.waite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 27 2011
    AZ Member #
    77478
    Location
    Seattle, WA

    USP balance shaft delete kit

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayz691 View Post
    So your just comparing it to how a 1.8t feels?? That don't sound very scientific. I made a post on tfsi tuning group on FB. Quite a few people have done the freewheel on there. Some say no difference. 1 or 2 said minimal, if any. So seems like a good way ta go. Another guy on my b7 group I chat with a lot, just got his in. So maybe I'll wait till je installs it, ta see what his results are. Wouldnt be a bad idea to get a fluiddamper, if they weren't so damm expensive..maybe I'll put one on the list.

    Sent from my LM-G710VM using Audizine mobile app
    They’re basically the same engine, so yea it’s fairly scientific. I would often drive my cars back to back. The 2.0t was so smooth compared to my 1.8t I’d often have to double check the cluster to make sure the engine was actually running. The 1.8t and the b7 2.0t are the same base engine but the 2.0t has direct injection, fancier timing adjusters, larger pistons, and balance shafts built into the oil pump. otherwise they’re INCREDIBLY similar.

    I’m not trying to convince you one way or another. There WILL be more vibration. VAG made plenty of dumb decisions with our engines but balance shafts DO make a difference or else they wouldn’t have developed a balance shaft system for ours and continued to refine and include it in all modern 2.0t engines. As I said before, whether or not that difference matters to you is another story. I like how smooth it runs and I’m not willing to go back to the 1.8t diesel feeling.

    Whether you care or not is totally up to you. Trust me I’m not taking a shit on the idea. For really modified engines it probably makes sense as the balance shafts can be a failure point you might want to eliminate. Or on the track all the g-forces could wreck the shafts really quickly too if you don’t have a really good oil baffle system. Or he’ll, maybe, like you, you just want to eliminate common failure points. They’re all totally legitimate reasons.
    Last edited by Charles.waite; 03-31-2020 at 06:55 AM.
    -CP
    2008 2.0t S-Line Ti 6MT Avant
    2017 Q7 3.0t
    SOLD -- 2012 Q5 2.0t - Stock Mommy Missile with new timing chains
    Former USP CLUB MEMBER #136
    2004 A4 1.8TQ 6MT USP - APR Stage 1+ - FSI Coils - BKR7EIX-11 - B6S4 Front + B7A4 Rear Brakes - 034 Street Trans Mount
    SOLD -- 2006 A4 2.0TQ Avant Tiptronic

  16. #56
    Veteran Member Four Rings i3oricua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 17 2006
    AZ Member #
    11575
    My Garage
    2022 Kia Sorento; 2015 Ducati Monster 821 Dark
    Location
    Aurora, Colorado

    I have deleted my shafts...hehe...and I have a fluidampr and stiffer motor mounts and a lighter flywheel clutch combo and the steel subframe bushing things....everything vibrates. Everything. Honestly though, it's definitely not like stock but I can't tell if the subframe bushings are the reason I get more vibrations or something else. It's not bad at all, the exhaust drone is more annoying than the vibrations.

  17. #57
    Established Member Two Rings BSTD_B7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 21 2018
    AZ Member #
    434272
    My Garage
    MK1 TT 225 Roadster
    Location
    Maine

    USP balance shaft delete kit

    Quote Originally Posted by i3oricua View Post
    I have deleted my shafts...hehe...and I have a fluidampr and stiffer motor mounts and a lighter flywheel clutch combo and the steel subframe bushing things....everything vibrates. Everything. Honestly though, it's definitely not like stock but I can't tell if the subframe bushings are the reason I get more vibrations or something else. It's not bad at all, the exhaust drone is more annoying than the vibrations.
    I’ll be in the same boat, balance shaft delete, billet crank pulley, BFI stage 2 motor & snub mount, 034 track density tranny mount, 034 rear diff subframe inserts, and apikol green monster diff carrier, thing is going to be on rails

    Edit:also a southbend stage 3 clutch & lightweight flywheel


    Big Turbo B7
    MK1 TT 225 Roadster
    Owner, Euros of New England INC.

  18. #58
    Veteran Member Four Rings Charles.waite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 27 2011
    AZ Member #
    77478
    Location
    Seattle, WA

    You’re also going to break your spine.

    Trust me, I totally get wanting to lock down the chasis and drivetrain, but at a certain point to sorta...ruin the car. I think there’s a sweet spot where you don’t ruin the driving experience by making it hard as a rock but things still feel fairly locked down and direct.
    -CP
    2008 2.0t S-Line Ti 6MT Avant
    2017 Q7 3.0t
    SOLD -- 2012 Q5 2.0t - Stock Mommy Missile with new timing chains
    Former USP CLUB MEMBER #136
    2004 A4 1.8TQ 6MT USP - APR Stage 1+ - FSI Coils - BKR7EIX-11 - B6S4 Front + B7A4 Rear Brakes - 034 Street Trans Mount
    SOLD -- 2006 A4 2.0TQ Avant Tiptronic

  19. #59
    Established Member Two Rings BSTD_B7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 21 2018
    AZ Member #
    434272
    My Garage
    MK1 TT 225 Roadster
    Location
    Maine

    Quote Originally Posted by Charles.waite View Post
    You’re also going to break your spine.

    Trust me, I totally get wanting to lock down the chasis and drivetrain, but at a certain point to sorta...ruin the car. I think there’s a sweet spot where you don’t ruin the driving experience by making it hard as a rock but things still feel fairly locked down and direct.
    Yeah I’m willing to sacrifice comfort, this car is only for summers, and I plan to drag it when I get tuning and everything squared away, don’t get me wrong I intend to drive the shit out of it but I don’t mind a rough ride, there’s something about knowing what you’re behind the wheel of that makes it exciting enough to just not care about being comfortable, the long drives to car shows will most definitely suck though


    Big Turbo B7
    MK1 TT 225 Roadster
    Owner, Euros of New England INC.

  20. #60
    Veteran Member Four Rings Charles.waite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 27 2011
    AZ Member #
    77478
    Location
    Seattle, WA

    USP balance shaft delete kit

    Quote Originally Posted by BSTD_B7 View Post
    Yeah I’m willing to sacrifice comfort, this car is only for summers, and I plan to drag it when I get tuning and everything squared away, don’t get me wrong I intend to drive the shit out of it but I don’t mind a rough ride, there’s something about knowing what you’re behind the wheel of that makes it exciting enough to just not care about being comfortable, the long drives to car shows will most definitely suck though


    Big Turbo B7
    MK1 TT 225 Roadster
    Well in that case more power to you. Sounds like you’re going to be making the compromise worthwhile. 99% of my driving is too and from work and around the city in stop and go, on shitty roads. My car is loud and bumpy enough as it is, not sure I’d be able to handle much more. I just plan on 034 street engine/trans mounts, powerflex purple rear diff, and possibly some poly control arm bushings to tighten up the steering feel.

    Though admittedly I really do feel the pull towards poly everything, haha. I just have a gut feeling that I would regret it eventually.
    -CP
    2008 2.0t S-Line Ti 6MT Avant
    2017 Q7 3.0t
    SOLD -- 2012 Q5 2.0t - Stock Mommy Missile with new timing chains
    Former USP CLUB MEMBER #136
    2004 A4 1.8TQ 6MT USP - APR Stage 1+ - FSI Coils - BKR7EIX-11 - B6S4 Front + B7A4 Rear Brakes - 034 Street Trans Mount
    SOLD -- 2006 A4 2.0TQ Avant Tiptronic

  21. #61
    Established Member Two Rings BSTD_B7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 21 2018
    AZ Member #
    434272
    My Garage
    MK1 TT 225 Roadster
    Location
    Maine

    Quote Originally Posted by Charles.waite View Post
    Well in that case more power to you. Sounds like you’re going to be making the compromise worthwhile. 99% of my driving is too and from work and around the city in stop and go, on shitty roads. My car is loud and bumpy enough as it is, not sure I’d be able to handle much more. I just plan on 034 street engine/trans mounts, powerflex purple rear diff, and possibly some poly control arm bushings to tighten up the steering feel.

    Though admittedly I really do feel the pull towards poly everything, haha. I just have a gut feeling that I would regret it eventually.
    I’ll let you know how awful it is when I finally get my manifold and surge tank in, and get everything installed lol


    Big Turbo B7
    MK1 TT 225 Roadster
    Owner, Euros of New England INC.

  22. #62
    Veteran Member Four Rings canadianA4B7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 10 2012
    AZ Member #
    87997
    My Garage
    parts
    Location
    Napanee, ON

    Quote Originally Posted by BSTD_B7 View Post
    Yeah I’m willing to sacrifice comfort, this car is only for summers, and I plan to drag it when I get tuning and everything squared away, don’t get me wrong I intend to drive the shit out of it but I don’t mind a rough ride, there’s something about knowing what you’re behind the wheel of that makes it exciting enough to just not care about being comfortable, the long drives to car shows will most definitely suck though
    Big Turbo B7
    MK1 TT 225 Roadster
    Big items to address balance the rotating assembly, it’s not close at all when you buy them new from IE, fluidampr, raise idle above VCDS max of 840. These few things with 1.8 oil pump, solid aluminum motor mounts, and race mounts along the entire driveline is perfectly comfy sitting in aluminum race seat. The 1.8 2003 engine was worse NVH. 100% no issues if you cover the list above.

  23. #63
    Veteran Member Four Rings Jayz691's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 21 2018
    AZ Member #
    412818
    My Garage
    2005 Subaru Legacy GT
    Location
    frackville, pa US

    Quote Originally Posted by canadianA4B7 View Post
    Big items to address balance the rotating assembly, it’s not close at all when you buy them new from IE, fluidampr, raise idle above VCDS max of 840. These few things with 1.8 oil pump, solid aluminum motor mounts, and race mounts along the entire driveline is perfectly comfy sitting in aluminum race seat. The 1.8 2003 engine was worse NVH. 100% no issues if you cover the list above.
    How do you raise the idle above the max on vcds? I changed it, but only idles as high as 800.

    Sent from my LM-G710VM using Audizine mobile app

  24. #64
    Veteran Member Four Rings canadianA4B7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 10 2012
    AZ Member #
    87997
    My Garage
    parts
    Location
    Napanee, ON

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayz691 View Post
    How do you raise the idle above the max on vcds? I changed it, but only idles as high as 800.

    Sent from my LM-G710VM using Audizine mobile app
    Your tuner will need to adjust.

  25. #65
    Veteran Member Four Rings Jayz691's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 21 2018
    AZ Member #
    412818
    My Garage
    2005 Subaru Legacy GT
    Location
    frackville, pa US

    Quote Originally Posted by canadianA4B7 View Post
    Your tuner will need to adjust.
    Ahh, ok. Thanx.

    Sent from my LM-G710VM using Audizine mobile app

  26. #66
    Veteran Member Four Rings vvenom800tt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 04 2011
    AZ Member #
    84791
    Location
    Kansas City, KS

    Get the black rear diff.

    I have black as well as the ecs inserts. No real change in vibration
    Quote Originally Posted by Charles.waite View Post
    Well in that case more power to you. Sounds like you’re going to be making the compromise worthwhile. 99% of my driving is too and from work and around the city in stop and go, on shitty roads. My car is loud and bumpy enough as it is, not sure I’d be able to handle much more. I just plan on 034 street engine/trans mounts, powerflex purple rear diff, and possibly some poly control arm bushings to tighten up the steering feel.

    Though admittedly I really do feel the pull towards poly everything, haha. I just have a gut feeling that I would regret it eventually.
    Sent from my SM-G960U using Audizine mobile app
    2005.5 Audi A4 Quattro 2.0T 6MT - APR - 034 - Custom 3" single exhaust - 17z Brembo - GFB - Alzor - Kumho - ST - Injen - Swift - Hyperco - ECS - Saikou Michi - PowerFlex - Podi

  27. #67
    Veteran Member Four Rings vvenom800tt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 04 2011
    AZ Member #
    84791
    Location
    Kansas City, KS

    I also have black powerflex upper control arm bushings and they firm things up nicely without ruining the ride.

    Do it!
    Quote Originally Posted by Charles.waite View Post
    Well in that case more power to you. Sounds like you’re going to be making the compromise worthwhile. 99% of my driving is too and from work and around the city in stop and go, on shitty roads. My car is loud and bumpy enough as it is, not sure I’d be able to handle much more. I just plan on 034 street engine/trans mounts, powerflex purple rear diff, and possibly some poly control arm bushings to tighten up the steering feel.

    Though admittedly I really do feel the pull towards poly everything, haha. I just have a gut feeling that I would regret it eventually.
    Sent from my SM-G960U using Audizine mobile app
    2005.5 Audi A4 Quattro 2.0T 6MT - APR - 034 - Custom 3" single exhaust - 17z Brembo - GFB - Alzor - Kumho - ST - Injen - Swift - Hyperco - ECS - Saikou Michi - PowerFlex - Podi

  28. #68
    Veteran Member Four Rings Charles.waite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 27 2011
    AZ Member #
    77478
    Location
    Seattle, WA

    USP balance shaft delete kit

    Funny you mention all those, I have a Powerflex purple rear diff and PSB front upper poly bushings. In addition to some 034 engine and tranny mounts. The rear diff might get installed this spring, but suspension stuff is likely a long way out sadly.

    I’ve been tempted by those rear diff carrier inserts though. I should probably pick some up for when I replace my rear carrier. Was also thinking about poly bushings for where the shock mounts to the lower straight are as well. I’ve seen poly replacements for those, but suspect that particular one will transmit a ton of vibration into the chassis...
    -CP
    2008 2.0t S-Line Ti 6MT Avant
    2017 Q7 3.0t
    SOLD -- 2012 Q5 2.0t - Stock Mommy Missile with new timing chains
    Former USP CLUB MEMBER #136
    2004 A4 1.8TQ 6MT USP - APR Stage 1+ - FSI Coils - BKR7EIX-11 - B6S4 Front + B7A4 Rear Brakes - 034 Street Trans Mount
    SOLD -- 2006 A4 2.0TQ Avant Tiptronic

  29. #69
    Veteran Member Four Rings vvenom800tt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 04 2011
    AZ Member #
    84791
    Location
    Kansas City, KS

    Yeah i need to replace my lower arms so im thinking about swapping out to all poly bushings once i do it. For the chassis side as well as the shock mount eyelet on the arm.

    Powerflex doesnt make the shock one but theres another company that does. I believe ecs carries them.

    The inserts helped im sure, but its hard to really tell since i had the black diff bushing installed already.

    They we're a pain to get in, make you have a long pry bar and lots of lube/grease for it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Charles.waite View Post
    Funny you mention all those, I have a Powerflex purple rear diff and PSB front upper poly bushings. In addition to some 034 engine and tranny mounts. The rear diff might get installed this spring, but suspension stuff is likely a long way out sadly.

    I’ve been tempted by those rear diff carrier inserts though. I should probably pick some up for when I replace my rear carrier. Was also thinking about poly bushings for where the shock mounts to the lower straight are as well. I’ve seen poly replacements for those, but suspect that particular one will transmit a ton of vibration into the chassis...
    Sent from my SM-G960U using Audizine mobile app
    2005.5 Audi A4 Quattro 2.0T 6MT - APR - 034 - Custom 3" single exhaust - 17z Brembo - GFB - Alzor - Kumho - ST - Injen - Swift - Hyperco - ECS - Saikou Michi - PowerFlex - Podi

  30. #70
    Veteran Member Four Rings vvenom800tt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 04 2011
    AZ Member #
    84791
    Location
    Kansas City, KS

    Looks like ecs now has 90A durometer lower control arm bushings for our car!

    https://www.ecstuning.com/b-ecs-part...210ecs01-03kt/

    Superpro makes the bushing for where the suspension fork mounts.

    https://www.ecstuning.com/b-superpro.../spf3590k~spr/

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Audizine mobile app
    2005.5 Audi A4 Quattro 2.0T 6MT - APR - 034 - Custom 3" single exhaust - 17z Brembo - GFB - Alzor - Kumho - ST - Injen - Swift - Hyperco - ECS - Saikou Michi - PowerFlex - Podi

  31. #71
    Veteran Member Four Rings vvenom800tt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 04 2011
    AZ Member #
    84791
    Location
    Kansas City, KS

    I just ordered the ecs kit since its on sale and its wayyyyy cheaper than ordering both the inner kits from powerflex.

    $99 to my door for all 4 inner bushings. 90A durometer.

    The powerflex black are 95A, which i want but im not gonna pay over double for another 5A shore.

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Audizine mobile app
    2005.5 Audi A4 Quattro 2.0T 6MT - APR - 034 - Custom 3" single exhaust - 17z Brembo - GFB - Alzor - Kumho - ST - Injen - Swift - Hyperco - ECS - Saikou Michi - PowerFlex - Podi

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


    © 2001-2025 Audizine, Audizine.com, and Driverzines.com
    Audizine is an independently owned and operated automotive enthusiast community and news website.
    Audi and the Audi logo(s) are copyright/trademark Audi AG. Audizine is not endorsed by or affiliated with Audi AG.