Audizine - An Automotive Enthusiast Community

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Veteran Member Three Rings
    Join Date
    Feb 22 2008
    AZ Member #
    25591
    My Garage
    03 A4 3.0 6MT
    Location
    The Meadows, NV

    Thumbs up running on regular unleaded (v6 3.0)

    Guest-only advertisement. Register or Log In now!
    I just finished a road trip of over 2600 miles. I decided to see the difference between running regular (87 in these parts) vs the 91 'recommended'.

    My trip went from Las Vegas -> Bellingham WA -> Sunnyvale CA -> Sequoia NP -> Las Vegas

    Probably 90% highway 10% city, driving the speed limit or with traffic, whichever was faster :) When in Rome...

    Overall I got 24.9 mpg. High was 27.5 mpg driving from Ely, NV to Caldwell, ID (408 miles), on 85 octane fuel (high altitude).

    No weird problems, but a definite loss of 'performance' (acceleration butt dyno confirmed).

    I did this because I am cheap, and when driving on these road trips, the price difference between 87and 91 octane is usually 45-50 cents, highest I've seen is 60. When fuel was $2 a gallon, a 25% increase from regular to premium always struck me as a bit offensive. The worst place is Pilot when their non-diesel fuel is supplied by Shell. (One place I refueled: https://www.gasbuddy.com/station/188666 3.29 for regular, 3.85 for premium) Other places only charge 22 cents more for premium.

    At any rate, the car ran well. I have 270,000 miles on it so still getting pretty much original EPA fuel economy. Nice to know if I am feeling especially penurious I can choose the 'regular' fuel for a discount and not have to worry about pinging, increased fuel consumption, or dirty looks from the 'you are running regular from a non-TopTier fuel supplier' crowd. I usually do only get toptier fuel, but on this trip I decided to slum it on a few tanks!

  2. #2
    Active Member Two Rings
    Join Date
    Apr 12 2018
    AZ Member #
    416980
    Location
    Camarillo/CA/USA

    So the real question is did your fuel economy suffer going from premium to regular or only a loss in spirited riding performance?

  3. #3
    Veteran Member Four Rings MSq5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 14 2017
    AZ Member #
    393251
    My Garage
    Toyota Highlander, Nissan Armada, Kubota M4030, Scag Tiger Cat 2
    Location
    Gulfport, MS

    Quote Originally Posted by road_tripper View Post
    I just finished a road trip of over 2600 miles. I decided to see the difference between running regular (87 in these parts) vs the 91 'recommended'.

    My trip went from Las Vegas -> Bellingham WA -> Sunnyvale CA -> Sequoia NP -> Las Vegas

    Probably 90% highway 10% city, driving the speed limit or with traffic, whichever was faster :) When in Rome...

    Overall I got 24.9 mpg. High was 27.5 mpg driving from Ely, NV to Caldwell, ID (408 miles), on 85 octane fuel (high altitude).

    No weird problems, but a definite loss of 'performance' (acceleration butt dyno confirmed).

    I did this because I am cheap, and when driving on these road trips, the price difference between 87and 91 octane is usually 45-50 cents, highest I've seen is 60. When fuel was $2 a gallon, a 25% increase from regular to premium always struck me as a bit offensive. The worst place is Pilot when their non-diesel fuel is supplied by Shell. (One place I refueled: https://www.gasbuddy.com/station/188666 3.29 for regular, 3.85 for premium) Other places only charge 22 cents more for premium.

    At any rate, the car ran well. I have 270,000 miles on it so still getting pretty much original EPA fuel economy. Nice to know if I am feeling especially penurious I can choose the 'regular' fuel for a discount and not have to worry about pinging, increased fuel consumption, or dirty looks from the 'you are running regular from a non-TopTier fuel supplier' crowd. I usually do only get toptier fuel, but on this trip I decided to slum it on a few tanks!
    I would be more concerned about your ECU pulling timing like crazy to prevent detonation and the effect on fuel trims. Lower octane actually burns hotter, too, increasing exhaust gas temps. Might not be so good on your cats.

    Interesting experiment, but not sure it is safe except for very short term.
    2017 Q5 3.0T S-Line | Brilliant Black | 034 Stage 2+dual pulley 93 octane tune | JHM 187mm crank pulley w/ EPL 57.6mm s/c pulley - 3.247 total ratio | Red Star shielded test pipes | Magnaflow high flow downstream ceramic core bottle cats | Vibrant Ultra Quiet Resos in place of OEM baby resos | aFe Pro 5R (part#10-10121) filter in "modified" stock air box | 034 silicone throttle body hose | HP Tuners custom TCU tuned ZF8 | Merc Racing HX | Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ 255/45/20.

  4. #4
    Veteran Member Three Rings
    Join Date
    Feb 22 2008
    AZ Member #
    25591
    My Garage
    03 A4 3.0 6MT
    Location
    The Meadows, NV

    Quote Originally Posted by AudiA4B61.8T View Post
    So the real question is did your fuel economy suffer going from premium to regular or only a loss in spirited riding performance?
    I think for highway driving at 80mph, the fuel consumption is the same. I can remember back when my 3.0 had less than 100K on it, I was driving north on I-15, filled the tank in spanish fork, ut and made it 460 miles on fumes to rocker, mt. Probably put in 17 gallons, so about 27 mpg. I did slow down to 60mph or so for the last 30 miiles or so as my 'distance to empty' was at zero.

    So I think no reduction in fuel consumption. On these drives, though, I only shift gears a few times, just to get from gas station on to the interstate, then I leave it in 6th for hours and hours and hours, until the fuel runs out. I never have to downshift for any hills/passes, running on the regular or premium.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


    © 2001-2025 Audizine, Audizine.com, and Driverzines.com
    Audizine is an independently owned and operated automotive enthusiast community and news website.
    Audi and the Audi logo(s) are copyright/trademark Audi AG. Audizine is not endorsed by or affiliated with Audi AG.