So I compared the depth of the bevel face on the lower vs the upper radiator hose. I noticed earlier that there was extra space where the O-ring sits. I also noticed a thunk when the connector stopped moving forward, as if it was shanking out.
So I took a depth measurement with the dial calipers. Depth of .36 in. I compared that to the upper radiator connector which fits smoothly without issue, and that measured .54 in. This is roughly the distance the connector doesn’t seat. Note in the pic below, how much space there is from the outer edge of the connector to the start of the bevel surface. Also not how there’s a smooth surface to all sides of the keyway for the index tab, unlike the lower connector.
My theory is that when removing the hose from the original radiator, it was more or less bonded to the original radiator and when I forced it off, it caused the bevel to migrate outboard. Further evidence for this can be seen by the lack of spring clamp slots inside the clamp, forward of the bevel. It appears the bevel now covers these slots. I previously assumed these were CNC milled and the bevel would not migrate, but based on this, it appears not?
Anyway, I look at this with two solutions. 1) replace lower radiator hose, which replaces the connector. Or 2) find a way to force the bevel surface back inboard. This surface may be press fit, so without a press, the amount of force required to press the original back into place might be a lot, probably more than can be generated in situ. Either way, looks like I’m pulling a lower radiator hose.
Thoughts?
Bookmarks