
Originally Posted by
jdmnomore
We aren't, but others have. Guys who felt it was robbin power posted before after dynos etc. Then a guy took a 75k mile car with no carbon clean ever done to the track and put down a world record pass. Sooo.. I'm just sayin seems pretty overblown.
I am NOT saying that our cars are not hurt by carbon buildup. It is absolutely not great for the engine. But it also is not a power mod and you absolutely are not gaining 30whp by doing just a carbon clean I'm sorry.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
The record was Sakimano's car, and it had 35k miles on it when he set the record.
To be sure, doing a carbon cleaning is not gaining 30hp over the stock rated 414hp, but you sure as hell are getting back up to it.
My last RS4 had 84,xxx miles on it when the carbon cleaning was done and had never had one performed. 30whp is a pretty realistic assessment of the power clawback I had with the cleaning, and here's why (anecdotal, I know, but still).
Pre-cleaning, I went on a mountain drive with some friends. One had a Focus ST and another had a 997 GT3. On the way up, about 60 miles of boring 4 lane highway, I pulled maybe 2 car lengths against the stock Focus ST in a 40-110 pull. It was shocking and a little embarrassing and motivated me to do the cleaning. I also ran the 997 GT3 and got totally destroyed.
A few weeks later, post cleaning, similar environmental conditions and I put bus lengths on the same Focus ST. Later that day, also re-ran the 997 GT3 and was fairly close (lost by maybe 1-2 car lengths), where before I was getting dusted.
So there is a big difference, especially if the car is higher mileage and hasn't had the cleaning done. I will say that some very high mileage cars may benefit more from maintenance (such as new/cleaned injectors) than from the carbon clean itself, but I can only provide 1 data point so far. Once my new RS4 arrives, I'll do some before/after testing to see what I can figure out.
Bookmarks