Originally Posted by
Thurston
The dual pulley game desperately needs some documented numbers. It's very confusing as to what you can expect to put down based on this mm and this and that . . . Hopefully in time it will become clearer or maybe I haven't looked in the right place but it's all very hazy to me (and unfortunately I'm a 93 only guy due to availability).
The only thing you can really document that would be objective across the board is pulley size, pulley ratio, and S/C rpm, these would not change based on environmental factors. There are too many other variables to document HP #'s unless the s/c pulley, crank pulley, and fuel quality is standard across the board.
93 octane works just fine with an AWE S/C pulley + a 194mm crank pulley. I ran straight 93 during my test/beta phase and was able to get near peak timing on the pump file in near 2000 D/A's and mid/upper 80's weather FWIW (...I only needed about 20% ethanol to clean it up in hotter weather). On a colder day, I would venture to say that I would hit all targets just fine without the extra ethanol.
The flexible nature of this file is the most impressive part, Garrett/GIAC really nailed it here as it should cover a broad base of available pulley sizes/fuel that potential customers already currently have or use.
Bookmarks