Audizine - An Automotive Enthusiast Community

Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: E85 Blending

  1. #1
    Active Member Two Rings Bko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 25 2013
    AZ Member #
    121738
    Location
    Mi

    E85 Blending

    Guest-only advertisement. Register or Log In now!
    This is more of a general discussion not expecting to getting answers given to me.

    In the B8 S4 forum there a discussion on mixing E85. Looks like its common to run a 30/70 mixture on other places on the internet.
    I currently run the Aeb PC-16 tune with a 3 bar FPR. Most people say they found it best to run 2.7-2.8 bar. I look into it but how does FPR affect fuel deliver?

    Is there a way to calculate the difference between the 3 bar and 2.7bar. Some numbers I have found online say you need 30% more E85 then regular gas.
    Using said calculated numbers could you safely use E85 to get to the fuel delivery of the 2.7 bar using the 3 bar and e85.

    Also
    I have the race tune (100 octane) could I just calculate for a 30% larger injectors and run straight E85. Being that E85 is close to 100-105 octane. I would think the timing maps for the race tune would be close to what an E85 tune would be? Pry making this to simplistic.

    Im going to look into this more, but figured it might be a interesting discussion.
    1999.5 silver 1.8tQM stage 1 on H&R springs
    1999.5 Brilliant Black 1.8tQM ebay k04 pc-16 supporting mods, Ecs stage 2 clutch
    1999.5 Volcano Black Pearl 2.8lQA

  2. #2
    Veteran Member Four Rings redline380's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 30 2008
    AZ Member #
    34773
    My Garage
    B5, B7, B8, 8V, 4M
    Location
    Big Lake, MN

    If you are going to run e85, you need more fuel. Adjusting the regulator is not the proper way. I mean you could potentially cheap an eye on AFR's, but EGT's would probably be out of hand.
    “You may recall we went to a PARK IN BOTSWANA." George W. Bush, 43rd President of the United States of America

    2020 SQ7- Wife's ride
    2018 RS3- Wish I could drive it more
    2010 A4- Why do I even own this?
    2007 A4 Avant 2.0T Titanium Package, aka "Big Red"
    2000 S4- Working?

  3. #3
    Veteran Member Four Rings Seerlah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 05 2007
    AZ Member #
    23104
    Location
    A place between here and there

    Playing the guessing game with fueling is not a smart idea. Worst case scenario, you blow your engine. Not sure worst case...use your imagination. But I can just about guarantee your car won't like it. If there is a concrete formula with the 70/30 ratio, then it would first need to be applied and tested to our car. If you are willing to let your car be the test car, this is how info gets created and spread for another to soak in.
    I hate it when my car acts like a little bitch, treating me like a bitch

  4. #4
    Veteran Member Four Rings
    Join Date
    Oct 10 2013
    AZ Member #
    124715
    My Garage
    98 Civic CX Hatch, 2012 CBR250R
    Location
    State College PA

    I thought E85 was closer to 115-120.

  5. #5
    Veteran Member Four Rings
    Join Date
    Sep 24 2010
    AZ Member #
    64817
    My Garage
    2001_Corvette_Z06
    Location
    Costa Mesa, SoCal

    Quote Originally Posted by Bko View Post
    I currently run the Aeb PC-16 tune with a 3 bar FPR. Most people say they found it best to run 2.7-2.8 bar. I look into it but how does FPR affect fuel deliver?

    Is there a way to calculate the difference between the 3 bar and 2.7bar.
    Fuel pressure is related to fuel delivery. There are calculators available online. FYI injectors are generally given their CC rating @ 3bar.
    http://www.deatschwerks.com/resource...ure-calculator
    So for example on the PC-16, if you're running 315cc injectors @ 2.7bar, actual fuel delivered is 299cc.

    redline is right, you can't just increase fuel pressure for E85 to increase fuel availability to sufficient levels. (you would have to run 5+ bar fuel pressure to achieve 30% higher flow compared to 3bar, and this isn't wise)

    Running E85 on AEB is tricky. AEB is narrowband, meaning it reads a very small lambda (AFR) range right around stoichiometric. It's much safer to run a wideband when tuning for E85, like what comes on the AWM. You may be able to find a tuner who will tune for E85 on AEB if you have a separate wideband gauge, though.

    In conclusion, don't just increase fueling 30% for running E85 and determine that it will be "safe". This is just asking for trouble.
    2011 Audi A4 Avant Prestige S-Line : Motoza ECU+TCU Stage 1, 4M Q7 6-piston with SQ5 rotors, C7 S6 rear brakes
    2001 Corvette (C5) Z06

    Past: 2015 A3 2.0T, 2001.5 S4 Avant 6mt , 2004 A4 USP 6mt , 1998.5 A4 1.8TM , 2001.5 A4 1.8TQM [gone and missed]

  6. #6
    Veteran Member Three Rings Rodgman15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 12 2014
    AZ Member #
    138773
    Location
    Fargo, ND

    I run e85 and e98 on AEB. Added a wideband gauge to use for tuning. I also use Maestro 7 which made fuel adjustments easy. Ended up adding roughly 25/30% fuel across the board relative to a pump gas tune. With that being said, you need injectors with that kind of headroom.

  7. #7
    Veteran Member Four Rings walky_talky20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 30 2008
    AZ Member #
    30427
    Location
    Erie, Pennsylvania

    Guys, I think you may be missing his point.

    OP does not want to run straight E85. He just doesn't.

    OP is running a PC16 tune with a 3 bar FPR, where 2.7 bar is actually recommended. So he is too rich.

    OP is wanting to run *some percentage* of E85 to bring down his effective fueling down, instead of actually dialing the pressure back to 2.7 bar.

    OP is wondering (A) if it can be mathematically determined what that percentage might be, (B) if this mixing business is safe, and (C) if it will perform the function he wants.

    OP thanks you for your input.
    ^Don't listen to this guy, he's not even a mechanic.
    2001 Laser Red A4 1.8TQM, 5-Speed Swapped, 4.11 Final Drive, APR 93, 2.5" Exhaust, ST Coilovers, 034 RSB, A8 Brakes Front & Rear
    2006 Passion Red Volvo V50 T5 AWD 6MT
    2000 Satin Silver Passat 1.8T FWD Wagon, Slippy Tiptronic, 15" Hubcaps
    2001 Aluminum Silver Metallic A4 Avant 1.8TQM (winter sled)

  8. #8
    Active Member Two Rings Bko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 25 2013
    AZ Member #
    121738
    Location
    Mi

    Quote Originally Posted by walky_talky20 View Post
    Guys, I think you may be missing his point.

    OP does not want to run straight E85. He just doesn't.

    OP is running a PC16 tune with a 3 bar FPR, where 2.7 bar is actually recommended. So he is too rich.

    OP is wanting to run *some percentage* of E85 to bring down his effective fueling down, instead of actually dialing the pressure back to 2.7 bar.

    OP is wondering (A) if it can be mathematically determined what that percentage might be, (B) if this mixing business is safe, and (C) if it will perform the function he wants.

    OP thanks you for your input.
    This is exactly what I am thinking.
    I probably should have not thrown in the part about the 100 octane tune this may have clouded my intentions.
    '
    I haven't thought of a method to calculate the ratio, but i've been busy this weekend so i haven't looked into it in much detail.
    1999.5 silver 1.8tQM stage 1 on H&R springs
    1999.5 Brilliant Black 1.8tQM ebay k04 pc-16 supporting mods, Ecs stage 2 clutch
    1999.5 Volcano Black Pearl 2.8lQA

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


    © 2001-2025 Audizine, Audizine.com, and Driverzines.com
    Audizine is an independently owned and operated automotive enthusiast community and news website.
    Audi and the Audi logo(s) are copyright/trademark Audi AG. Audizine is not endorsed by or affiliated with Audi AG.