Actually, net, never again.
So, I had a A8L W12 for almost ten years and 100K. Four seater and infinitely more room than the already compromised back of an A7/S7/RS7. Over the years we went from two teens at home, and their friends riding along, to empty nester. Many times an issue w/ only four seats. Only time it worked well was two adult couples or family of 4 only. A kid friend was almost always the fifth that broke the equation of seats to bodies. And for me, The D3/4 body works for real adults of decent size, but not so much the 7 set up--both knees and headroom. Of course, as soon as you add a fifth--kids' friend, extra person along for the ride, something extra to carry, whatever, SOL. At least on a long body you have a bunch of space down at floor for stuff or a small dog (not a huge one). No go on 7. We would find ourselves taking the Q5 for nights out solely because of the fifth seat, even with the way plusher and generally roomier L W12.
Even as now empty nester, this time I systematically rejected any 4 seater W12 or A8 with the barcalounger four seat set up. Among the factors that brought me strongly to current D4 S8. And as empty nester, don't need all the seriously extra room back there, and even a SWB D body is more generous than an A6/S6 for all of knee, leg and shoulder room. But we still have friends, the adult kids with a boyfriend along, etc. From having gotten in back of an RS7 on showroom floor on way to S8 decision, I was out of there in like two seconds. At around 6'1" not even in the ballpark of do-able. S6 somewhat tight but manageable for real adults and easily for kids and teens. Had various C sedans for two dozen years pre- D bodies, many a time w/ 5 on board, and a (generous) full trunk. The one give up on a D body compared to a C sedan is the fold down seat; can't have a folded seat on a D body because that bulkhead is a key structural member. If cargo important (or folded seat for dog), might be a consideration.
Bookmarks