Originally Posted by
adamazing
It was Lettuce - but it was never definitively identified if that can was the problem because he already had a consumption/leaky piston-ring situation going on. I also erred on the side of caution by re-attaching my manifold port, and like above, it rendered the can useless.
ECS looked into it, had an engineer chime in, and found no issues. I'm still on the fence about hooking it back up. The amount of positive pressure coming out of the valve cover still has me reluctant.
I have the 034 system, which replaces the OEM breather plate. At idle, there is also positive pressure at the oil filler. I believe this is to be expected, since the turbo is not pulling through the catch can at idle and the point of least resistance is the oil filler opening. When the cap is replaced, the next exit point will be through the breather plate, catch can, and on to the turbo. Evan though the turbo is not under boost at idle, I assume the crankcase can still vent by this route and not put undue pressure on engine seals. After several years of use, I have no issues and I have not heard of others with seal problems. The ECS system uses the OEM PCV plate/ diaphragm but with the intake no longer in the path I believe. I don't know if it will allow crankcase pressure to vent through the turbo at idle. As far as I can tell, it has no other place to go, so I would assume the ECS developers have addressed this?
In older vehicles, positive pressure at the filler or dipstick was a sign that the PCV system was plugged or broken, and would usually result in a blown seal. Our engine is somewhat different though and I don't fully understand the pathway for crankcase gases with the OEM PCV in place.
Bookmarks