Originally Posted by
JohnnyUtah787
Maybe I'm wrong, but the general idea behind chassis braces is to reduce chassis twist/flex, not body roll. Sway bars, on the other hand, are specifically designed to reduce body roll. However, the change in "feel" while driving may end up being quite similar I guess. You probably can't go wrong with either, but I would definitely do one thing at a time so you can see how things change.
No, you're right that a beefier sway bar will generally always be more resistant to body roll than a less-beefy (beef-less?) sway bar. If I remember from my suspension dynamics class, oh, all of...dear lord almost 12 years ago now...I think a sway bar increases in stiffness by diameter (d) to the power of 4? d^4 Which is why even a relatively small increase in diameter (say from 21mm to 24mm) results in a bar nearly twice as rigid. (21^4 vs 24^4)
On this platform in particular, in stock form, it seems that rear chassis flex and rear chassis rigidity are large contributors to the feeling of body roll under hard cornering, based on the car's tendency to understeer at the limit, and just from driving one at the limit. This is why I mentioned the rear chassis brace did a solid job of reducing the body roll, because it targets those area's specifically. Before and after, just the rear chassis brace, was a very noticeable reduction in body roll under hard cornering. It also improved the tendency for understeer, to the point that power-on oversteer is very possible (and fun) with the extra power from a tune.
That's not to say it wouldn't be even better w/ a rear sway bar, in all likely hood a rear sway bar by itself is probably more effective than the rear chassis brace by itself, it's just not the route I went. If the car ever spends more time dedicated to the track, it's never too late to add one :)
Bookmarks