Originally Posted by
Dr GP
Exactly. BMW, Lexus and others Artificially set their residuals high in order to keep lease payments low. At the end of the lease, the residuals are usually higher than the wholesale value of the car . At that point, the financially sound decision is to just give the car back. Manufactures are subsidizing these leases in order to sell more cars. Audi does not do this. Many times at lease end, Audi residuals are lower than wholesale, The cars actually have equity, which makes it unreasonable to just turn them in. Trading before lease end or buying the car are viable options. I got $6k when I traded my 2010 S4. I put that down on the lease on a a new 2014 lease. I could have just as well put it in my pocket. Plus you don't even have to trade it in on an Audi either. BUT in the last 90 days of the lease AFS will make a non Audi dealer buy the car fro near retail price , even though you can buy it for a lot less.
True. So Audi puts the owner in a good financial position at lease end by keeping the residual low, but if low payment is ideal for you then that may not help so much. Again, to each their own and to what you're trying to achieve.
In Lexus' defense, in contrary view. The market always has high remarks for our vehicles and how their value holds up. A car is not the best investment all across the board. But I've been able to find positive equity in my customers' cars and move them into a new car with no money out of pocket with minimal change if any to their payment on a brand new car. So Lexus does have capabilities of giving low lease payments, high residuals, but also achieving equal value to pay off. Not in all cases 100%, but historically achievable on certain models like the RX SUV.
Bookmarks