Originally Posted by
PEM
TTRStud - The S5/RS5/S6/S7/RS7 are plenty fast for the rest of us for what they're used for. Not everyone wants to drift around or track their cars enough to care, either.
We live in America where most of our commutes happen on straight, boring highways. Why do you think so many people are obsessed with 0-60 times? If I want a track car that can go around corners, I'll buy a Lotus or Miata over a BMW all day every day. But you're right though, M cars do have better handling in pristine conditions on a track. Add some real world variables and weather in that mix and let me know how that goes for you.
Your first paragraph is 100% subjective and opinion-based, so I'm not even going to respond to that. It derails from the subject of the characteristics of the car, and you're making an assumption for the masses that may very well be true, or untrue.
I live in America as well, and clearly, my automotive interests are different from yours and those of the masses that you described above. While keeping practicality in mind, a Lotus or a Miata wouldn't cut it. Believe it or not, there are much better performing practical cars out there than our beloved Audi's. Don't get me wrong, I love my car, I enjoy it, and I stand by it; but I'm also realistic. I've never had an issue with balanced rwd cars, in any type of conditions - they also require a higher level of driving expertise while being pushed to the limit (under any circumstances), and I love a good challenge. It appears that these days people pick their cars based on what the cars do for them; even at my young age, however, I'm still of the mentality that I pick cars based on what I can do with them, and not what they can do for me. I've tracked rwd cars a few times, with "some real world variables" in the mix, and you'd be surprised to know that it went rather well for me.
Cheers!
Bookmarks