Originally Posted by
tateltot
And I literally just installed my JB1 yesterday. Heh! I don't regret going with the JB1, but this could be a great option when I move to Stage 2 (assuming APR hasn't answered the flash-it-yourself market).
the #'s you posted look solid. and def impressive.
I do prefer a real tune though. it's not a honda, after-all, this is an Audi S3.
but with respect, the real question for you, OP, is why would you not consider UNI?
have you driven a mk6 or mk7 uni car?
UM hit a homerun with the mk6, would you not consider them, if they had a flash at home?
why only APR?
I really need to start questioning people's judgement.
1. UNI has flash at home. it's great. there is no reason to wait for APR to get flash at home. the UNI software and the process are flawless. I've had their tune on my golf r and now S3 for 20,000 miles combined.
2. it is my opinion that APR will never offer flash at home b/c their dealers will freak out on them. the dealers benefit from all the updates that APR forces their customers to get. from a business perspective, it makes sense for the dealers to be upset by flash at home. when the customer can't flash at home... more $ for the dealer. more face to face contact. more ability to sell hw.
just b/c UNI doesn't spend as much money on their tents and trailers, doesn't mean that the software is inferior in any way. in fact, their (UNI) tunes feel more polished. more refined. more oem+. but with the same gains*
*when I say same gains, I'm suggesting that all the big boys UM UNI APR GIAC all probably make the same gains within 2-3%.
for me, if they all gain around the same area.... delivery and reliability is key to me. polished tune that feels oem+, that I can turn on/off from my driveway, from a company who waits until a tune is ready to release it.
hope this helps in some way.
Bookmarks