Originally Posted by
jshwon
You are misunderstanding "my logic". No one is arguing the point of not taking one random dyno result and using that as a benchmark for anything. No were did I say that the delta's are not what matters. What I am saying is there have been several tuners that have done just what you say, and measured against their baseline runs with the same car, dyno etc. And guess what..each tuner is in the same horsepower range for their stage 1 and or stage 2 tunes. So with that you get an average or expectation of how much horsepower you should be gaining with certain software/hardware. While delta's are very important you can't just ignore what the peak horsepower is...
Sorry man, you're missing the point entirely, and a basic understanding of the relative nature of a dyno.
...And guess what..each tuner is in the same horsepower range for their stage 1 and or stage 2 tunes.
That doesn't matter at all, it's coincidence and should be interpreted as such, the result is
relative to each individual dyno. My local shop uses an AWD MAHA style dyno that puts out numbers that wouldn't make sense to most people, they read significantly lower than just about every other dyno type. The
delta, on the other hand, is on par with what you'd expect for net percentage increase for before/after modifications. Doesn't mean the tune is off or the car is off or the dyno is wrong, the number is
relative to that dyno and that dyno alone.
...Your car is manufacture rated at 250 (for example) it dyno's at 180. You don't care? It doesn't matter?
No, it doesn't, because that's not how relativity works. I could go to three different dynos in the same day and get wildly different stock peak numbers. That same MAHA dyno I mentioned above? Bone stock Golf R's and S3's sit somewhere around 210-220WHP as an average. If that were the only figure you looked at, you might think, "Man, that's low, everyone else is dyno'ing at X". That's flawed, and an incorrect way to interpret those results. What you'd also see, if you did an AFTER modification delta run, is that the percentage increase of the base number is right in line with what you'd expect for that modification...even if the peak number by itself is somewhat disappointing. Catching my drift?
Each dynos output is
relative to how
that dyno is configured. All I know is on
that dyno on
that day my base is now (using your example) 180. Now, if three other stock S3's happened to visit
that dyno on
that day and put out significantly more or less than me, that might be cause for concern that something is wrong with the car. It doesn't change the relative nature of each dyno or that fact that peak numbers compared across them is useless.
No peak HP numbers aren't everything but they aren't irrelevant.
I also never said peak numbers were irrelevant, I said they're useless without a delta to show what the total net gain was. See example above.
/end thread jack, sorry OP, I was simply trying to put some context around why these types of runs don't really show anything without a before run and a delta to compare against, I will leave it be.
Bookmarks