I read this review and found it really bad. Almost every other test rates the car very highly and it seems like the tester didn't even drive it. Am I just biased? I had a MK2 TTS, loved it and now drive an A5 but the TTS was one of the more fun cars I've had. Here are a couple highlights that made me cringe:
"It’s a little generous to call the 2016 Audi TT a sports car." - That was the opening sentence.
"The TT weighs less than 3,200 pounds, thanks to that aluminum body, which makes it feel a bit effervescent to drive. It can and will catch air if you take certain turns hard enough.." Really? Did she catch air turning hard on public road? I'd hate to drive with her.
"And without too much effort you can skid quite easily in this on a fast exit ramp dismount." Again, seems implausible?
Anyway, I hated this review, it is what is wrong with auto journalism these days. How is this person qualified? It seemed like she didn't drive the car or doesn't have any experience and was trying to write a piece that would somehow maker her seem like an expert but made her look like a moron.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...-talking-about
Bookmarks