
Originally Posted by
AllroadCorbin
I'm pretty sure the S4 will consistently run faster to 60 than a Stock S3. In order to get the S3 to do a 60 mph run in the high 4s you need to used launch control at 4k rpm. If you did no launch procedures in either car and just mashed the gas from a green light, the S4 would be gone....So in everyday driving the S4 would feel quicker IMO
Car and driver does not agree with you.. You need to do launch control in the S4 to get the 4.7 sec. The S3 is a fast car and when it comes to fasts cars you need 3 things.. Power, light weight, and traction. The cars are about the same IMO you just have to pick what you want.. Do you want a bigger car and less mpg or smaller car and better mpg.
http://www.caranddriver.com/audi/s4
0-60 in 4.7 but C&D got 4.9
Top Speed 155mph
http://www.caranddriver.com/audi/s3
0-60 in 4.4
5-60 in 5.6 (I think this is because it will downshift when you are rolling at 5 mph)
0-100 in 10.8
1/4 mil in 12.8
Top Speed: 155 mph
Towards a few comments I saw on this forum.
I avg about 22 mpg in my S3. I do more highway driving then city driving, and I would consider my self a spirited driver.. I can't help it 0-60 mph is pretty fun.. Going 80 MPH with cruise control on I get about 26-28 mpg. I owned a 2011 GS with LS3 6.2L. On the highway going about 70 mph I could get about 25 mpg and @ 80 mph I would get 22 mpg.. This is because the car is light and very aerodynamic. I would avg about 18 mpg with my spirited driving. I don't know how that guy was avg such a high mpg with a V8 engine other then having it towed around town hehehe..
I dropped in a K&N air filter this past and I'm going to keep a close eye to see if this helps my avg mpg..
Also you can't compare a tuned turbo car because a lot of times the tuned cars will get better mpg then stock.. I would venture to say a tuned s3 would get a better mpg then a stock s3 although I don't have any data on the S3 to backup this statement but on my Saab 93 I did.
Bookmarks