
Originally Posted by
b6onboost
Having 8 speeds allows for more aggressive gearing in 1st/2nd which results in quicker acceleration.
While I agree with you in theory, that's not what the data suggests. From what I've found, comparing a
2010 6sp to a
2012 8sp:
Code:
6sp 8sp
1st 4.171 4.714
2nd 2.340 3.143
3rd 1.521 2.106
4th 1.143 1.667
5th 0.867 1.285
6th 0.691 1.000
7th 0.839
8th 0.667
final 3.517 2.848
Once you take into account the final drive ratio, you are left with:
Code:
6sp 8sp
1st 14.669 13.425
2nd 8.23 8.951
3rd 5.349 5.998
4th 4.020 4.748
5th 3.049 3.660
6th 2.430 2.848
7th 2.389
8th 1.900
So strangely, if this data is correct, 1st is actually geared lower (higher ratio) in the 6sp than the 8sp. Though 2nd is slightly lower in the 8sp than in the 6. It seems to me looking at this, there has to be more to it than the ratios allowing it to make a quicker jump off the line. On the surface, you would think the 6sp would have the advantage in 0-60... the 8sp needs three shifts to get there, while it looks like the 6sp could hit 60 while still in 2nd. But the tests show the 8sp is quicker.

But the torque converter could be different, the programming of how/when it locks up could be different, the ratios could match the torque curve better.
Bookmarks