Is The RS5 Fast Enough????

[LeoLopezDO]

My dealer has a RS5 on the lot that was test driven by the dealership big wigs.My service advisor told me that he was a little disappointed in the fastness of the RS5 and felt it should have been a bigger difference between it and the S5.Do those current owners of the RS5 agree with this statement.Does the RS5 lack the quickness of RS type of car or are you very satisfied.I became a little skeptical when I heard this statement...Thanks

I thought it was too slow...this is after I rode "top thrill dragster" at cedar point (0-100 in 4 seconds?)...

Listen, numbers are what they are..0-60 in 4.3-4.5 range...quarter mile in the mid-low 12 seconds. Top end at 174mph....

thats as fast as every other car that runs the same numbers...stupid obvious statement but its an obvious response given the numbers this car puts up consistently.

wait till you launch one of these sums a bitches...its incredible.

[B45H1R]

I thought it was too slow...this is after I rode "top thrill dragster" at cedar point (0-100 in 4 seconds?)...

Listen, numbers are what they are..0-60 in 4.3-4.5 range...quarter mile in the mid-low 12 seconds. Top end at 174mph....

thats as fast as every other car that runs the same numbers...stupid obvious statement but its an obvious response given the numbers this car puts up consistently.

wait till you launch one of these sums a bitches...its incredible.

APR's unbroken in RS5 did 0-60 in 4.2 seconds (there is a link somewhere around here).
Motor Trends broken in test car did 0-60 in 4.0 seconds.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ec_first_test/

Also not to beat a dead horse, but it also spanks the M3 if you bother looking at the actual compilation of track times. Plus these are with the 2010 set up. If you look at the 2012 numbers the RS5 is faster still.
http://www.fastestlaps.com/compariso...audi_rs_5.html

[mantena]

APR's unbroken in RS5 did 0-60 in 4.2 seconds (there is a link somewhere around here).
Motor Trends broken in test car did 0-60 in 4.0 seconds.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ec_first_test/

Also not to beat a dead horse, but it also spanks the M3 if you bother looking at the actual compilation of track times. Plus these are with the 2010 set up. If you look at the 2012 numbers the RS5 is faster still.
http://www.fastestlaps.com/compariso...audi_rs_5.html

If you consider the looks on top of all that performance, it not only spanks the m3, it beats it into the ground!!!!!! The me, c62, cts-v don't compare in the looks department.

[if6ws9]

If you consider the looks on top of all that performance, it not only spanks the m3, it beats it into the ground!!!!!! The me, c62, cts-v don't compare in the looks department.

+1