Couple of questions to start:
-What gear did they do the runs in?
-Would the shop be able to provide a run from some other stock car? It could be a low reading dyno, so if they have a stock car (any car) to compare against that could give you some insight. For example when I dyno'd my S4, a stock S4 did 264whp/247wtq so my car did 65whp/43wtq over a stock car.
-RE: the AFR, was that measured with a tailpipe sniffer? Do you have any cats? I would log the requested and actual lambda fields to ensure the measurement is accurate.
Comments:
-Something definitely seems amiss with the intake manifold, you should see a single torque spike, not the double (or the negative spike). To confirm you could have someone sit in the car and rev the car in neutral and watch the actuators. They should move once the car is started changing it over to the long runner, then change back at around 4.5k to 5k rpm. I suspect you'll see a change at ~3k and ~5k rpm similar to how the tri-runner manifold works. I never found a measuring block that recorded the voltage to the vacuum solenoid, but you could log that manually if you have the equipment.. the stationary test should be sufficient though.
-Its too late now to test on the dyno, but one trick is to pull the vacuum line off of the manifold switch over solenoid and cap it. This will lock the car into the short runner, redyno and overlay the charts. Your low end should be worse, but the top end of the curves should more or less overlap after the switchover point (+ some rpm due to the disturbance of moving the flap), if they don't there is an issue. You could test this in your logs as well, do one with the line connected and one with it pulled/capped, look at the MAF g/s curves as a function of rpm (unfortunately vcds does not line up each measuring block, so to do it dead on you have to extrapolate rpm from the time stamps).
-The 93 tune will be much stronger, there isn't as much room in the 91 tune.
-For the logs, your timing retard looks very low which often indicates a free flowing exhaust (removing cats helps reduce retard quite a bit).
-Could you repeat the log in a 3rd gear pull, from 1800-7200 rpm, and with turbo mode enabled if it wasn't (higher sampling rate)? The longer pull will give more even data for better conclusions. The 100mph top end can be hairy with law enforcement so do a few dry passes to make sure no one is watching. All my logs are in 3rd gear so I can compare more directly with a 3rd gear log.
-One thing I noticed is in 2nd gear the dip in MAF g/s at 5000k prm, likely due to the change in runners. My logs typically plateaued there, not dipped (dMAF/dt=0 not <0). That could be an indication of an issue with the intake manifold runners switching.
-If you can get a 003/020/021 3rd gear log to start, then I can look up other blocks to log to check the injectors/AFR.
Bookmarks