Originally Posted by
nycgtm
Yeah, stirring up the pot a little. Addind a couple of hundred bucks, total of $1075 are these worth it?
From a performance standpoint?: No. The STs and the H&Rs will perform VERY similarly. Any coilover less than $1500 (besides maybe Vogtland GTs) I consider to be "Level 1" performance coils. Basically, you're getting a basic coilover setup that will improve handling and is tuned well, but not tuned for a race-track. More serious stuff is KW V3s, Motons, Ohlins, *perhaps* PSS9s, but they aren't quite motorsport grade.
From a warranty standpoint?: Maybe? If you truly value a lifetime warranty, then sure, maybe the H&Rs are worth it, but the 5-years ST warranty is alright. Not as awesome as the 10 year warranty Vogtland provides, but better than the 1-year warranties other companies provide.
I'm telling you right now that if you drive in NYC often, you genuinely want something that is on the comfortable side, and you'll want to keep the height at reasonable levels. "Reasonable" = not m0Ar low. Something considered "soft" on perfect SoCal roads, is almost unacceptably harsh on NYC's pothole ridden streets.
Some of the STs appear to be suffering from clunking, like old Vogtlands did. Also:
Originally Posted by
Mike@PureMS from Quattroworld
The newer stuff [newer Vogtlands] isn't quite as good as the older stuff, and is identical to the ST suspension, which has been hit or miss with us lately.
Been pushing Eibach now, which uses the same shocks the original Vogtland kits did, which were very highly regarded.
Something to keep in mind, I guess.
Originally Posted by
Aggv
Unless you're tracking your car regularly (real track, not drag strips) there really is no reason not to get the ST's. The value is hard to beat.
And I agree with this, to the point that if someone is seriously tracking their car on a road course, any of the so-called "budget" coilovers are basically eliminated. You'll want something a little more stout/adjustable for that.
Bookmarks