Originally Posted by
tuan0011
Thanks Blake,
It must be done indeed. Something about double digit width gets me going alright.
Alan@Modbargain is recommended by FStar that 19x9 +42 is suitable. I think they are going soully off Anthony's setup.
+40 seems about right, stupid question but does the A4 have all 4 camber toe adjustments (front trak model)? I am thinking I go 9" up front with ET 38. Is this fender flush aggressive?
Only the rears have camber adjustment. Toe is adjustable on all 4 corners.
By "fender flush" do you mean the inside edge of the fender or outside edge? Obviously the only way to have the lip of your wheels flush with the outside edge of the fender and not have (much) rubbing is to run stretched tires. Another factor to consider is how low you plan to go. My car is lowered to the point where there is no gap between the top of the tires and the fenders, but the tires are not tucking behind the fenders. This brings my camber to roughly -2 degrees on all 4 corners. I'm running 8.5" ET28 up front and I'd say the wheels are flush with the inside edge of the fenders. I probably have another ~4mm before I'd say they're flush with the outside of the fenders. ET28 on 8.5" is the same as ET34 on 9", ET40 on 9.5", ET46 on 10". If you want the lips flush with the outside edge of the fenders, those numbers become (approximately) ET24 on 8.5", ET30 on 9", ET36 on 9.5", ET42 on 10". Keep in mind, this is strictly based on my measurements and calculations. I've seen ET33 on 9.5" and it looked like the front wheels were poking beyond the fenders very slightly. The guy was stretching 235/35/19 tires in order to avoid rubbing and it probably would have been VERY close with 245's. For me, I think ET36 on 9.5" with 245's is the ideal fitment to create the flush aggressive stance without rubbing.
Bookmarks