Audizine - An Automotive Enthusiast Community

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 99
  1. #1
    Veteran Member Four Rings lowandslow4now's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 12 2008
    AZ Member #
    30813
    Location
    Cumming, GA

    The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    Guest-only advertisement. Register or Log In now!
    Thanks for looking
    Last edited by lowandslow4now; 12-23-2011 at 06:45 AM.
    Now 2001 B5 S4
    Former B5 A4, 034 Stage 3 BT, Unitronics,H&R,etc,etc

  2. #2
    Senior Member Two Rings
    Join Date
    Jul 03 2008
    AZ Member #
    30535
    My Garage
    A4
    Location
    NJ

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    You had to tow the car home cuase you couldnt get a boost pipe up, jsut use break cleaner next time to clean up the oil.

    on a side note form what i understand the Chris Tapp software is much better then the uni software when it comes to the AEB motor due to the Tapp software spending alot more time on the MAF tune.

    are those broken studs on the SPA mani?

    any plans to upgrade the rods?

  3. #3
    Veteran Member Four Rings pipe7284's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 14 2006
    AZ Member #
    11300
    My Garage
    `07 Audi A4 S-Line 6MT Quattro | '01 Audi S4 AVANT 6spd
    Location
    Lansing, MI

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    you and my girl have twin cars!!!! lol laser red on black wheels. and BT
    '01 Audi S4 6spd Black AVANT DAZ E85 Tune Frankenturbo F21s / 034 RS4 inlets / BOSCH EV4 72# injectors / Walbro 450L fuel pump / Daz 89mm maf housing / AFE Intake Cone / SRM SMICs / 034 street density trans and motor mounts / SSAC downpipes / Vibrant catback exhaust / H&R Ultra Low Coilovers / 18x9.5 Rota Grids / 17z Brembo front BBK / 034 Rear BBK / JHM Short shifter / JHM stg 3 clutch / PODI Boost gauge / [/CENTER]

    SOLD

  4. #4
    Veteran Member Four Rings lowandslow4now's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 12 2008
    AZ Member #
    30813
    Location
    Cumming, GA

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    everytime I started the car the turbo was shooting oil out and boost pipe would just pop right off all I had in the car was some windex in the car that I sprayed and wiped down the pipes with. luckily I didnt have to pay for the tow I had road side assistance from my insurance and they coverd 17 miles for free and to my house is 16.6 miles. I plan going with tapp I ended getting the uni file for dirt cheap to get going. There are no broken studs on the mani I just had one in there I have it mounted on the car now I am just waiting on some parts from Issam. I am eventually going to replace the rods I am not shooting for huge numbers yet.
    Now 2001 B5 S4
    Former B5 A4, 034 Stage 3 BT, Unitronics,H&R,etc,etc

  5. #5
    Senior Member Two Rings
    Join Date
    Jul 03 2008
    AZ Member #
    30535
    My Garage
    A4
    Location
    NJ

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    Pics of the turbo! wheres it from?

  6. #6
    Veteran Member Four Rings lowandslow4now's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 12 2008
    AZ Member #
    30813
    Location
    Cumming, GA

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    Its a garrett turbo I am actually waiting for delivery of it.
    Now 2001 B5 S4
    Former B5 A4, 034 Stage 3 BT, Unitronics,H&R,etc,etc

  7. #7
    Senior Member Three Rings bernB5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 13 2007
    AZ Member #
    22533
    Location
    Long Island, NY/ Hartford, CT

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    Quote Originally Posted by lowandslow4now View Post
    Its a garrett turbo I am actually waiting for delivery of it.
    no idea why you went with that turbo, it's a terrible choice.
    57 trims are laggy as hell and don't really have any benefits over a 50 trim. They also have the tendency to surge.

    A 57 trim with a .63 a/r hits full boost around 4500, an .82 will be awful.
    Either spend the money and get a dbb garrett (3071 or 30r) or go with a 50 trim .63 or .82.

    You should also go with tapp tune like stated above, they are known to be much better on aeb, dbc setups. not telling you what to do, or trying to be a dick, i just hope you did some research before buying that turbo, because it's not going to be fun.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJgShp8ap7I
    Old: 97 30r'd A4 ---> headaches
    New: Evo IX MR ---> 354awhp/349tq and couldn't be happier

    BERNSTEINphotography

  8. #8
    Veteran Member Four Rings lowandslow4now's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 12 2008
    AZ Member #
    30813
    Location
    Cumming, GA

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    I understand what you are saying I am going under Issam's recomendation on the turbo and with the software I am going to go with tapp just not right now.
    Now 2001 B5 S4
    Former B5 A4, 034 Stage 3 BT, Unitronics,H&R,etc,etc

  9. #9
    Veteran Member Four Rings goody6691's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 23 2005
    AZ Member #
    5418
    Location
    Elkton Md, B.A.T certified

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    its about time you started that build
    too much shit to list
    Dave

    it runs bitches..............im back

    98.5,Brilliant Yellow, Audi ,A4,Quattro, 2.0, je, eagle, cat cams, tial, hta3076r, tap 630, CCW Classics, Falken,SPA, Autopower, Sparco

  10. #10
    Senior Member Three Rings bernB5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 13 2007
    AZ Member #
    22533
    Location
    Long Island, NY/ Hartford, CT

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    Quote Originally Posted by lowandslow4now View Post
    I understand what you are saying I am going under Issam's recomendation on the turbo and with the software I am going to go with tapp just not right now.
    alrighty.
    what are your power goals btw? is this your dd?
    Old: 97 30r'd A4 ---> headaches
    New: Evo IX MR ---> 354awhp/349tq and couldn't be happier

    BERNSTEINphotography

  11. #11
    Veteran Member Four Rings lowandslow4now's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 12 2008
    AZ Member #
    30813
    Location
    Cumming, GA

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    This car is not my daily driver and has not been for over a year. To start I will be going for about 300 awhp as the the torque should not be a problem for rods then when I do rods and headwork I will probably try to get up about 400 which I think this turbo will be able to produce. But I am going to be doing this build little by little and it is primarily for the track.
    Now 2001 B5 S4
    Former B5 A4, 034 Stage 3 BT, Unitronics,H&R,etc,etc

  12. #12
    Senior Member Three Rings bernB5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 13 2007
    AZ Member #
    22533
    Location
    Long Island, NY/ Hartford, CT

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    those goals could have easily been met by a 50 trim .63 a/r..
    Old: 97 30r'd A4 ---> headaches
    New: Evo IX MR ---> 354awhp/349tq and couldn't be happier

    BERNSTEINphotography

  13. #13
    Veteran Member Four Rings lowandslow4now's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 12 2008
    AZ Member #
    30813
    Location
    Cumming, GA

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    True but I can make the same power with less boost
    Now 2001 B5 S4
    Former B5 A4, 034 Stage 3 BT, Unitronics,H&R,etc,etc

  14. #14
    Veteran Member Three Rings
    Join Date
    Dec 12 2006
    AZ Member #
    14141
    Location
    Charlotte,NC

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    Quote Originally Posted by bernB5 View Post
    no idea why you went with that turbo, it's a terrible choice.
    57 trims are laggy as hell and don't really have any benefits over a 50 trim. They also have the tendency to surge.

    A 57 trim with a .63 a/r hits full boost around 4500, an .82 will be awful.
    Either spend the money and get a dbb garrett (3071 or 30r) or go with a 50 trim .63 or .82.

    You should also go with tapp tune like stated above, they are known to be much better on aeb, dbc setups. not telling you what to do, or trying to be a dick, i just hope you did some research before buying that turbo, because it's not going to be fun.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJgShp8ap7I
    57 trims SUCK, I had one on my 1.8T and that mofo surged like crazy past 20psi
    MK4 GTi 1.8T converted to AWD
    New 1/8th mile 7.36@102mph-27psi 93 octane, no meth
    New build times 23psi pump 11.9@126mph-96mph in the 1/8th
    04' A4 1.8t frontrak converted to quattro, was RWD for a lil now its quattro finally
    2011 JSW Tdi 6speed manual

  15. #15
    Veteran Member Three Rings
    Join Date
    Dec 12 2006
    AZ Member #
    14141
    Location
    Charlotte,NC

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    Quote Originally Posted by lowandslow4now View Post
    True but I can make the same power with less boost
    By what 1-2psi lol, You will be much happier with a 50 trim....
    MK4 GTi 1.8T converted to AWD
    New 1/8th mile 7.36@102mph-27psi 93 octane, no meth
    New build times 23psi pump 11.9@126mph-96mph in the 1/8th
    04' A4 1.8t frontrak converted to quattro, was RWD for a lil now its quattro finally
    2011 JSW Tdi 6speed manual

  16. #16
    Veteran Member Four Rings lowandslow4now's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 12 2008
    AZ Member #
    30813
    Location
    Cumming, GA

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    I know the 57trims are not a fan favorite but I was reasured that I would have good power and I shouldnt have a problem
    Now 2001 B5 S4
    Former B5 A4, 034 Stage 3 BT, Unitronics,H&R,etc,etc

  17. #17
    Senior Member Three Rings bernB5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 13 2007
    AZ Member #
    22533
    Location
    Long Island, NY/ Hartford, CT

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    Quote Originally Posted by O2VW1.8T View Post
    By what 1-2psi lol, You will be much happier with a 50 trim....
    pete, this is alex, oldschool vdubbz337 from vortex haha. I was referring to you, when I mentioned what's up with the 57 trim.

    Quote Originally Posted by lowandslow4now View Post
    I know the 57trims are not a fan favorite but I was reasured that I would have good power and I shouldnt have a problem
    dude, you're just standing up for some information given to you by one person. you will NOT be happy with the 57 trim.. and running a tiny bit less boost to make the same power, with a smaller powerband... what's the point?

    buddy of mine just made 370whp on an awp, stock block, stock head, and 25psi, on a 50 trim .63.

    i won't lecture you any more about this, but you should just listen to us and exchange the turbo while you still can.
    Old: 97 30r'd A4 ---> headaches
    New: Evo IX MR ---> 354awhp/349tq and couldn't be happier

    BERNSTEINphotography

  18. #18
    Registered User Four Rings
    Join Date
    Feb 26 2006
    AZ Member #
    10540
    My Garage
    Over 20! too many plant pots!
    Location
    Earth

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    Quote Originally Posted by bernB5 View Post
    but you should just listen to us and exchange the turbo while you still can.
    He is listening to me....
    His power goal is limited for now.

    I ran a 57 trim for a good number of years.Take that for what it is worth....notice the A/R in this combination.

    Every customer and build is treated case by case.

  19. #19
    Senior Member Three Rings bernB5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 13 2007
    AZ Member #
    22533
    Location
    Long Island, NY/ Hartford, CT

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Issam@034 View Post
    He is listening to me....
    His power goal is limited for now.

    I ran a 57 trim for a good number of years.Take that for what it is worth....notice the A/R in this combination.

    Every customer and build is treated case by case.
    Taking all things into account, you really feel the 57 trim is a better choice? I just don't see why, but, it's all good.
    He said he's running this with an .82 a/r, which will probably get rid of any surging issues present on the .63, but it will be super laggy. No matter what the case, the 50 trim seems like a better option in all circumstances. I look forward to the results. (not questioning your opinion/knowledge Issam, just curious..)
    Old: 97 30r'd A4 ---> headaches
    New: Evo IX MR ---> 354awhp/349tq and couldn't be happier

    BERNSTEINphotography

  20. #20
    Veteran Member Four Rings Seerlah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 05 2007
    AZ Member #
    23104
    Location
    A place between here and there

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    I am no expert, but I came to learn a while ago that the Garrett T Series Turbo is not a turbo people get too comfprtable with, as the lag can be rather frustrating. It is still a good turbo for the money. But with a few extra hundred bucks, a Garrett BB would not really leave a person wishing they went with a different turbo. I guess if he likes to drive in the higher RPMs or had bigger displacement, then the T Series is a do-able street turbo. As agreeing with bernB5, I would have either gone with the 50 trim or a BB.

    I know Jumboblack1.8T has a GT30xx on his stock block, and am sure there is lag there. I don't know how the lag compares to the T Series, but I was told from the beginning when I first started to do searches on turbos that I would not like the T series (of course I am not the OP, just using referance to a scenerio). Even though it is cheaper than the BB, that is one of the reasons people do not run those turbos. Maybe a meth/water kit can change the situation though

    But I still always respect Issam's opinions when it comes to the matters of vehicles. Of course, that is his field of expertise.

  21. #21
    Veteran Member Four Rings lowandslow4now's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 12 2008
    AZ Member #
    30813
    Location
    Cumming, GA

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    I have driven in a few bt T series cars and I like when then boost hits the car rarely sees the street and if it does it is the highway going somewhere if I want to have fun in sthe street I have my wifes MKV GLI to play with.lol
    Now 2001 B5 S4
    Former B5 A4, 034 Stage 3 BT, Unitronics,H&R,etc,etc

  22. #22
    Active Member Three Rings 4inchMAF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 04 2008
    AZ Member #
    32718
    Location
    Columbus O-high-O

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    Quote Originally Posted by lowandslow4now View Post
    I understand what you are saying I am going under Issam's recomendation on the turbo and with the software I am going to go with tapp just not right now.

    i can believe he would suggest that turbo. no offense, but that was a bad, bad choice for out motor. it surges like crazy, and even with a .63 the lag is terrible. i have a .63 50 trim right now, any more lag than this would suck!!!
    .82?!!! that is RIDICULOUS!!! why SOOOOO big? im not joking when i say you will have about a 1000 RPM power band (and with stock rods you wont want to run much more than about 15PSI on that thing). so MAD lag just for low boost.

    and since youre not doing rods, using 440cc injectors will be just fine. 300AWHP can easily be achieved with 440's. if youre making power to the point where you NEED 630's, you are going to break a rod...

    i dont mean to sound like a dick. the guy i sold my GTI to blew the 50 trim it came with and put on a 57 trim. after 5 weeks at 15PSI on a 440 file he blew the motor apart...

    if you are dead set on keeping that 57 trim (if you cant return it for a 50 trim), do yourself a BIG favor and at the very least get a .63 housing for it...

    good luck happy

    Quote Originally Posted by Seerlah View Post

    I know Jumboblack1.8T has a GT30xx on his stock block, and am sure there is lag there. I don't know how the lag compares to the T Series. Maybe a meth/water kit can change the situation though

    water/meth has NOTHING to do with lag
    Last edited by 4inchMAF; 02-07-2009 at 11:45 PM.

  23. #23
    Veteran Member Four Rings ghost6303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 03 2008
    AZ Member #
    34881
    My Garage
    98A41.8TQM
    Location
    CT

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    if more advanced timing = increased EGTs = increased exhaust velocity.
    increased exhaust velocity = faster spool = less lag.

    wouldnt water/meth lower your EGTs (& IATs) and increase octane allowing you to run more advanced timing to help spool the turbo? just a thought...

    that should be a fun car when you get it done. looks nice.

  24. #24
    Veteran Member Three Rings
    Join Date
    Apr 14 2008
    AZ Member #
    27670
    My Garage
    a4 avant
    Location
    marlboro

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    bro good luck with the setup...tseries are fun i loved mine way worth the money i saved on not going bb...
    everyone talks about lag but honestly on my 50trim i was fully spooled by 45 if not 4


    keep us updated
    -vrt-

  25. #25
    Veteran Member Four Rings lowandslow4now's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 12 2008
    AZ Member #
    30813
    Location
    Cumming, GA

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    I dont mind the lag. The car is not a dd maybe if it was a dd then the lag might bother me but this build is going to be in steps and more for fun so if something breaks I can afford to have the car down for whatever period of time.
    Now 2001 B5 S4
    Former B5 A4, 034 Stage 3 BT, Unitronics,H&R,etc,etc

  26. #26
    Veteran Member Four Rings .Mad Hatter.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 07 2007
    AZ Member #
    17843
    Location
    Canada

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    ill be keeping my eye on this, basically my desired setup except with a .63 A/R

  27. #27
    Veteran Member Four Rings 20vpower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 05 2006
    AZ Member #
    12331
    My Garage
    1998 A41.8TQMS
    Location
    San Jose, CA

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    Nice choice for hardware on this setup. Hope to see this running well soon with some numbers.
    Previously: 12vPower
    97 12v fwd CACTUS GREEN (SOLD... thank god)
    98 1.8tqms MELANGE 50 trimd

  28. #28
    Veteran Member Four Rings lowandslow4now's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 12 2008
    AZ Member #
    30813
    Location
    Cumming, GA

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    Thanks I should be recieving the rest of my 034 Stage 3 kit today so I am a little excited. But this is the beginnig there is so much that goes into this its insane but little by little is how i have to do it.
    Now 2001 B5 S4
    Former B5 A4, 034 Stage 3 BT, Unitronics,H&R,etc,etc

  29. #29
    Veteran Member Four Rings Seerlah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 05 2007
    AZ Member #
    23104
    Location
    A place between here and there

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    Quote Originally Posted by 4inchMAF View Post

    water/meth has NOTHING to do with lag
    I was under the assumption that the Meth also makes the turbo spool faster. Not by much, but maybe 500RPMs.

    To the OP, what turbo did you decide for your final decision? I noticed you ordered a kit on the 034 Turbo Kit thread.

  30. #30
    Veteran Member Four Rings lowandslow4now's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 12 2008
    AZ Member #
    30813
    Location
    Cumming, GA

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    I just took delivery of the kit I ended up going with the T3/TO4E 57trim .82AR
    Now 2001 B5 S4
    Former B5 A4, 034 Stage 3 BT, Unitronics,H&R,etc,etc

  31. #31
    Veteran Member Four Rings 20vpower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 05 2006
    AZ Member #
    12331
    My Garage
    1998 A41.8TQMS
    Location
    San Jose, CA

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    now put it on!
    Previously: 12vPower
    97 12v fwd CACTUS GREEN (SOLD... thank god)
    98 1.8tqms MELANGE 50 trimd

  32. #32
    Veteran Member Four Rings lowandslow4now's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 12 2008
    AZ Member #
    30813
    Location
    Cumming, GA

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    I wish I could this weekend but I am heading to ny for the weekend but I have to say that the downpipe is a quality piece.
    Now 2001 B5 S4
    Former B5 A4, 034 Stage 3 BT, Unitronics,H&R,etc,etc

  33. #33
    Veteran Member Four Rings 20vpower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 05 2006
    AZ Member #
    12331
    My Garage
    1998 A41.8TQMS
    Location
    San Jose, CA

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    damn i should have held out for the spa mani...
    Previously: 12vPower
    97 12v fwd CACTUS GREEN (SOLD... thank god)
    98 1.8tqms MELANGE 50 trimd

  34. #34
    Veteran Member Four Rings lowandslow4now's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 12 2008
    AZ Member #
    30813
    Location
    Cumming, GA

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    Quote Originally Posted by 20vpower View Post
    damn i should have held out for the spa mani...
    The Spa mani is a nice piece but the install can be tough especially tightening the bottom bolts on the mani. I am going to try and do some of the install today. I put the downpipe in yesterday and while I was under the car I noticed one of the linkages for the shifter was about to come out.The bolt in there had almost backed out completely.
    Now 2001 B5 S4
    Former B5 A4, 034 Stage 3 BT, Unitronics,H&R,etc,etc

  35. #35
    Veteran Member Four Rings lowandslow4now's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 12 2008
    AZ Member #
    30813
    Location
    Cumming, GA

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    Pics no longer available.
    Last edited by lowandslow4now; 12-23-2011 at 06:47 AM.
    Now 2001 B5 S4
    Former B5 A4, 034 Stage 3 BT, Unitronics,H&R,etc,etc

  36. #36
    Veteran Member Four Rings .Mad Hatter.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 07 2007
    AZ Member #
    17843
    Location
    Canada

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    kit looks awesome...good work.

  37. #37
    Veteran Member Four Rings AudiA4_20T's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 29 2005
    AZ Member #
    8553
    My Garage
    10speed
    Location
    San Francisco, CA

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    nice
    - Clint

    Current : 2013 Q5 3.0T Prestige S-Line - 11.6@117 - 034 Stage2+ FBO
    Gone : One of the first ever 2.7T Swaps - White '04 S4 2.7T - Stage 2+
    Gone : Fastest B6 A4 ever - 464awhp/12.1@116

  38. #38
    Veteran Member Four Rings pipe7284's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 14 2006
    AZ Member #
    11300
    My Garage
    `07 Audi A4 S-Line 6MT Quattro | '01 Audi S4 AVANT 6spd
    Location
    Lansing, MI

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    sexy, you still need to rotate that compressor housing counterclokwise a little bit for the intercooler piping.
    '01 Audi S4 6spd Black AVANT DAZ E85 Tune Frankenturbo F21s / 034 RS4 inlets / BOSCH EV4 72# injectors / Walbro 450L fuel pump / Daz 89mm maf housing / AFE Intake Cone / SRM SMICs / 034 street density trans and motor mounts / SSAC downpipes / Vibrant catback exhaust / H&R Ultra Low Coilovers / 18x9.5 Rota Grids / 17z Brembo front BBK / 034 Rear BBK / JHM Short shifter / JHM stg 3 clutch / PODI Boost gauge / [/CENTER]

    SOLD

  39. #39
    Senior Member Two Rings
    Join Date
    Jul 03 2008
    AZ Member #
    30535
    My Garage
    A4
    Location
    NJ

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    why do you say that? thats the same way i have my IC pipe going over the frame rail

  40. #40
    Senior Member Three Rings bernB5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 13 2007
    AZ Member #
    22533
    Location
    Long Island, NY/ Hartford, CT

    Re: The low and maybe not so slow build thread

    yeah, it will also leave room for a nice inlet to go down and back up
    Old: 97 30r'd A4 ---> headaches
    New: Evo IX MR ---> 354awhp/349tq and couldn't be happier

    BERNSTEINphotography

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


    © 2001-2024 Audizine, Audizine.com, and Driverzines.com
    Audizine is an independently owned and operated automotive enthusiast community and news website.
    Audi and the Audi logo(s) are copyright/trademark Audi AG. Audizine is not endorsed by or affiliated with Audi AG.