Audizine - An Automotive Enthusiast Community

Results 1 to 23 of 23
  1. #1
    Active Member Four Rings EUROTEK//S4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 02 2007
    AZ Member #
    15336
    My Garage
    BMW M3/AUDI S4
    Location
    Chicago,IL

    Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    Guest-only advertisement. Register or Log In now!
    What is the difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?


    Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25
    Size: 225/45R17
    Serv. Desc: 94V
    Load Range XL
    UTQG: None

    Price: $155.00 (each)

    Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25
    Size: 225/45R17
    Serv. Desc: 91H
    UTQG: None
    Price: $147.00 (each)
    01' B5 S4 STG.II TIP

  2. #2
    Veteran Member Three Rings Rajan147's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 23 2007
    AZ Member #
    22787
    Location
    Columbus, OH

    Re: Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    94 - Load index(670kg/tire)
    91- Load index(615kg/tire)
    H- Speed rating 130mph
    V- speed rating 149mph

    i have ws50's on my car right now and they are 91H load and speed.

    The second one you posted will suffice.
    B5 S4 AWE Stage 3 - sold

  3. #3
    Veteran Member Four Rings S4 Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 04 2005
    AZ Member #
    6341
    My Garage
    2000 A8, 1992 300zx, 2000 R1
    Location
    Connecticut

    Re: Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    for the extra 32 bucks, id do the top ones... chances are you may not need the extra speed rating, and you wont need the weight rating... but its only 32 bucks... what happens if you wanna hit 150 with 3 fat passengers? then your out of luck, haha
    2000 Audi S4 - Rip (Someone elses bad)
    1991 300zx TT - Rip (My Bad)
    1992 300zx - Hope I have better luck
    2000 Audi A8

  4. #4
    Veteran Member Three Rings Rajan147's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 23 2007
    AZ Member #
    22787
    Location
    Columbus, OH

    Re: Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    Quote Originally Posted by S4 Dan View Post
    for the extra 32 bucks, id do the top ones... chances are you may not need the extra speed rating, and you wont need the weight rating... but its only 32 bucks... what happens if you wanna hit 150 with 3 fat passengers? then your out of luck, haha
    touche
    B5 S4 AWE Stage 3 - sold

  5. #5
    Veteran Member Four Rings MacDaddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 06 2008
    AZ Member #
    31677
    Location
    Canadia

    Re: Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    the s4 is suppose to have 94V.

    I went for 94H, good to 210km/h which is the fastest i have ever been in the S4, it gets kinda hairy around 160km/h+ and i don't intend on going 240 in this thing.
    the B5 S4 is like the mafia... there is only one way out!

  6. #6
    Veteran Member Four Rings MacDaddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 06 2008
    AZ Member #
    31677
    Location
    Canadia

    Re: Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    oh yeah, blizzacks suck, get nokians.
    the B5 S4 is like the mafia... there is only one way out!

  7. #7
    Veteran Member Four Rings espo4442's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 14 2008
    AZ Member #
    24136
    Location
    Carlisle, PA

    Re: Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    Quote Originally Posted by MacDaddy View Post
    oh yeah, blizzacks suck, get nokians.
    How do blizzaks suck? I'd have to say given the right tire for your correct climate (precip, temp, road conditions). They are the best winter tire you can buy
    2010 Brilliant Black/Magma Red S4

  8. #8
    Veteran Member Three Rings DarkcydS4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 13 2005
    AZ Member #
    6858
    My Garage
    e92 335xi FBO+Meth, 2014 BMW X3 M-Sport
    Location
    Madison, WI

    Re: Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    try looking at the blizzak ws-60...speed rating is way low but since your in the midwest with me you might enjoy them a lot. They are studless snow/ice tires. Have them on the S and on the wife's GTI.

  9. #9
    Veteran Member Four Rings onemoremile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 09 2004
    AZ Member #
    1174
    My Garage
    99.5 A4 Avant, 01 allroad
    Location
    nw michigan.

    Re: Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    High speeds on snow tires is a bad idea all the way around. Soft treads with lots of sipes and voids tend to feel very unstable and sometime unbalanced past freeway speeds.

    If you've got a clear enough road to hit high speeds in the winter then you'll also be putting a lot of heat into tires that really don't like that. The road temp would have to be well above freezing since nobody here is reckless enough to hit 130+ on roads that could have black ice, or are they?
    Jim

    We cannot achieve the future by being timid. It requires aggressive imagination.

    I Do Werk.

  10. #10
    Veteran Member Four Rings MacDaddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 06 2008
    AZ Member #
    31677
    Location
    Canadia

    Re: Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    Quote Originally Posted by espo4442 View Post
    How do blizzaks suck? I'd have to say given the right tire for your correct climate (precip, temp, road conditions). They are the best winter tire you can buy
    think about it, blizzacks are made in japan with winters about as harsh as the west coast of north America, Nokians are made in finland, north of the arctic circle. That alone separates the boys from the men, you wouldn't buy a snow tire developed in arizona would you?

    I've used the blizzacks before personally, they only griped in powder (which most all seasons do fine at anyway) had no grip on ice and can't deal with slush. I've recently purchased a set of nokian WRG2's after it (the brand) was recommended by several people living in northern Canada, and my friend got a set with his late X5. I wish i had known about these tires before money was wasted on those Blizzacks.

    so basically to recap, yes the blizzacks do perform ok in a very specific setting, but the Nokians perform well in all snow conditions. Its like the differance between a single weight oil and a multigrade.
    the B5 S4 is like the mafia... there is only one way out!

  11. #11
    Veteran Member Four Rings 1997gtx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 14 2006
    AZ Member #
    11275
    My Garage
    14 GLI
    Location
    CT

    Re: Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    [shameless plug]

    I have Dunlop Winter SP Sport 3D tires mounted on stock painted S4 Rims for sale if anyone is interested. PM Me.

    [/shamelss plug]
    --Adam
    Have questions? E-mail me.

  12. #12
    Veteran Member Three Rings Rajan147's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 23 2007
    AZ Member #
    22787
    Location
    Columbus, OH

    Re: Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    Quote Originally Posted by MacDaddy View Post
    think about it, blizzacks are made in japan with winters about as harsh as the west coast of north America, Nokians are made in finland, north of the arctic circle. That alone separates the boys from the men, you wouldn't buy a snow tire developed in arizona would you?

    I've used the blizzacks before personally, they only griped in powder (which most all seasons do fine at anyway) had no grip on ice and can't deal with slush. I've recently purchased a set of nokian WRG2's after it (the brand) was recommended by several people living in northern Canada, and my friend got a set with his late X5. I wish i had known about these tires before money was wasted on those Blizzacks.

    so basically to recap, yes the blizzacks do perform ok in a very specific setting, but the Nokians perform well in all snow conditions. Its like the differance between a single weight oil and a multigrade.
    I would say the research and development of the product is more important than the location of production.

    But how does the wear of the Nokian compare to that of blizzaks?
    B5 S4 AWE Stage 3 - sold

  13. #13
    Active Member Four Rings EUROTEK//S4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 02 2007
    AZ Member #
    15336
    My Garage
    BMW M3/AUDI S4
    Location
    Chicago,IL

    Re: Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    Quote Originally Posted by MacDaddy View Post
    think about it, blizzacks are made in japan with winters about as harsh as the west coast of north America, Nokians are made in finland, north of the arctic circle. That alone separates the boys from the men, you wouldn't buy a snow tire developed in arizona would you?

    I've used the blizzacks before personally, they only griped in powder (which most all seasons do fine at anyway) had no grip on ice and can't deal with slush. I've recently purchased a set of nokian WRG2's after it (the brand) was recommended by several people living in northern Canada, and my friend got a set with his late X5. I wish i had known about these tires before money was wasted on those Blizzacks.

    so basically to recap, yes the blizzacks do perform ok in a very specific setting, but the Nokians perform well in all snow conditions. Its like the differance between a single weight oil and a multigrade.

    Thanks! I will look into it....how much do they go for ? any good websites to buy from ? i dont think tirerack has them...
    01' B5 S4 STG.II TIP

  14. #14
    Veteran Member Three Rings Rajan147's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 23 2007
    AZ Member #
    22787
    Location
    Columbus, OH

    Re: Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    Quote Originally Posted by EUROTEK//S4 View Post
    Thanks! I will look into it....how much do they go for ? any good websites to buy from ? i dont think tirerack has them...
    I would just buy adams set, probably exactly what you need at a 1/3 of the price.
    B5 S4 AWE Stage 3 - sold

  15. #15
    Veteran Member Four Rings 1997gtx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 14 2006
    AZ Member #
    11275
    My Garage
    14 GLI
    Location
    CT

    Re: Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rajan147 View Post
    I would just buy adams set, probably exactly what you need at a 1/3 of the price.
    x infinty ... Besides, my dunlops are better tires =)
    Have questions? E-mail me.

  16. #16
    Veteran Member Four Rings espo4442's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 14 2008
    AZ Member #
    24136
    Location
    Carlisle, PA

    Re: Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    Quote Originally Posted by MacDaddy View Post
    think about it, blizzacks are made in japan with winters about as harsh as the west coast of north America, Nokians are made in finland, north of the arctic circle. That alone separates the boys from the men, you wouldn't buy a snow tire developed in arizona would you?

    I've used the blizzacks before personally, they only griped in powder (which most all seasons do fine at anyway) had no grip on ice and can't deal with slush. I've recently purchased a set of nokian WRG2's after it (the brand) was recommended by several people living in northern Canada, and my friend got a set with his late X5. I wish i had known about these tires before money was wasted on those Blizzacks.

    so basically to recap, yes the blizzacks do perform ok in a very specific setting, but the Nokians perform well in all snow conditions. Its like the differance between a single weight oil and a multigrade.

    I'd be willing to beat that the tires had more extensive research and development than your basic winter found in japan. Think about it there is a reason why blizzaks are ranked near the top. I cant make arguments against Nokians, in which they might very well be good tires, but from my experience blizzaks have been awesome on both the snow and ice for me.
    2010 Brilliant Black/Magma Red S4

  17. #17
    Forum Moderator Four Rings Daft's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 17 2004
    AZ Member #
    620
    My Garage
    Stg 3 '04 A6 2.7T, Stg 2 '14 S4, 2016 SQ5, 2019 RS5 coupe
    Location
    Sterling, VA

    Re: Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    I recently made this buying decision and I'd like to share some info on the main difference between the two models.

    While the 94V is a higher speed and load rating, this results in a much firmer sidewall. As a result of the firmer sidewall, this tire will give a harsher ride over bumps and pavement seems. It will also apply more force to the wheel during a hard impact. The higher load rating will also be a bit louder and create some resonating sounds at specific speeds.

    The 91H is well within the load rating of the B5 S4 and the H rating is good up to 130MPH.


    On my A6, I had the choice of 2 LM25 tires with ratings of 94H and 97V. Since the A6 is heavier, the 94 load rating is the minimum.
    I have driven my LM25 94H up to 120MPH so far and they are extremely quiet and safe.

    Last year I ran the Dunlop Winter Sport 3D with a load rating of 97V and the ride was very rough over bumps and made much more noise between 80-85MPH. I also ended up with 4 bent wheels at the end of the winter season.

    As a few have mentioned, the need for a 149MPH winter tire is pretty low. 130MPH is a good limit for winter driving. Honestly, the fastest I've ever driven on a highway in 3-4" of snow is about 75MPH so, 130MPH is well within my snow driving needs.
    Brett - Moderator
    Issue?: email me.
    _____________________
    Stage 3 2004 A6 2.7T 6M

  18. #18
    Veteran Member Four Rings MacDaddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 06 2008
    AZ Member #
    31677
    Location
    Canadia

    Re: Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rajan147 View Post
    I would say the research and development of the product is more important than the location of production.

    But how does the wear of the Nokian compare to that of blizzaks?
    part of R&D involves testing, and if you compare weather patterns you will see Finland makes a better test bed than japan.

    not sure what your asking in the second question, The nokians i got are their all weather tires (severe service certified all season) so they should last considerably longer than the winter-only blizzacks. Thats right, nokians jack of all trades tire is better than Bridgestone's proprietary winter tire.
    the B5 S4 is like the mafia... there is only one way out!

  19. #19
    Veteran Member Four Rings MacDaddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 06 2008
    AZ Member #
    31677
    Location
    Canadia

    Re: Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    Quote Originally Posted by espo4442 View Post
    . Think about it there is a reason why blizzaks are ranked near the top.
    thats the logic i used before taking the plunge, all i can say now is the reason for that is they benefit from a case of being "the emperors new clothes."

    Just like the guy who upgrades from a 1988 jalopy of a civic to a 2008 nissan versa, he will tell you the car is great, but we all know (having driven a car that is much better, an audi) that that is simply not true.
    the B5 S4 is like the mafia... there is only one way out!

  20. #20
    Active Member Four Rings EUROTEK//S4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 02 2007
    AZ Member #
    15336
    My Garage
    BMW M3/AUDI S4
    Location
    Chicago,IL

    Re: Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    I ended up going with brand new Nokian WRG2's 225/45/17 ($877 installed)

    a couple questions:

    the nokian tires are 94H instead of Audi OE 91H ? is that good or bad for the car ?
    also, my traction control light came on after changing all 4 tires ???
    01' B5 S4 STG.II TIP

  21. #21
    Veteran Member Four Rings AB18's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 17 2004
    AZ Member #
    4538
    Location
    US

    Re: Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    I have the ws50s as well, and i love them. Ive used them for years and only have great things to say about them.
    2001 S4 6sp...has a few goodies...and JHM shifted

    Tons of parts for sale..

    GIAC A box ECU for sale-350shipped.

    http://www.audizine.com/forum/showthread.php?t=170072

  22. #22
    Veteran Member Four Rings MacDaddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 06 2008
    AZ Member #
    31677
    Location
    Canadia

    Re: Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    Quote Originally Posted by EUROTEK//S4 View Post
    I ended up going with brand new Nokian WRG2's 225/45/17 ($877 installed)

    a couple questions:

    the nokian tires are 94H instead of Audi OE 91H ? is that good or bad for the car ?
    also, my traction control light came on after changing all 4 tires ???
    higher load rating, nothing to worry about.

    if the TC light is on, mabey they damaged one of the wheel speed sensors, does ABS still work?
    the B5 S4 is like the mafia... there is only one way out!

  23. #23
    Active Member Four Rings EUROTEK//S4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 02 2007
    AZ Member #
    15336
    My Garage
    BMW M3/AUDI S4
    Location
    Chicago,IL

    Re: Difference between this two Blizzak LM25 tires?

    Quote Originally Posted by MacDaddy View Post
    higher load rating, nothing to worry about.

    if the TC light is on, mabey they damaged one of the wheel speed sensors, does ABS still work?
    thanks, TC light is off now...

    I found out that im leaking windshield washer fluid from somewhere... .....its always something with this f!@$ car!

    also, im a little confused about the Nokian WRG2's..on their website they are listed as winter tires, but the guy at the tires shop said they are all-season tires ???? or winter / all- season ??? a tires can not be all-season and winter at the same time ??? ...should of gone with Nokian Hakkapeliitta's
    01' B5 S4 STG.II TIP

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


    © 2001-2024 Audizine, Audizine.com, and Driverzines.com
    Audizine is an independently owned and operated automotive enthusiast community and news website.
    Audi and the Audi logo(s) are copyright/trademark Audi AG. Audizine is not endorsed by or affiliated with Audi AG.