Originally Posted by
michael66899
I'd skip on the studded tires, I have some wintersport M3s and absolutely love them, I go skiing 20+ times a year and have never had to put my chains on. I love going up hills next to SUV's and pickups that are stuck, people don't realize how much of a difference tire compound makes. I also had the WS-50s and they were awsome in the snow/ice, a little better than the dunlops, but they sucked in the rain (loved to hydroplane) thats why I went with the Dunlops and will probably stick with them in the future. They are actually a very good dry tire, and wear much better than the blizzaks.
Yup, those WS-50's didn't have any circumferential grooves for slush and water and they acqua-planed pretty bad, but this was their only fault and I knew this and went with a 195/55R16 on my OEM rims - about as narrow as you can go on a 7" rim. The new WS-60's have a better tread pattern for H2O evacuation in slush and rain. Now, they're unbeatable. My Dad has them on his A6 and flies (relatively speaking, as he's 62!) through standing water. I had the Nokians on my old Golf and they were awesome too, I must admit. Anyone notice on the Tire Rack website that the brand new Michelin X-Ice Xi2 tire (updated version of the X-Ice) now narrowly surpasses the WS-60 in their tests? I love when companies keep trying to out-do each other, as the consumer ultimately wins.
Anyway, stick with one of these brands, get the "studless ice & snow" model they make (as opposed to the "performance" winter tire version"), run them as narrow as you can find with a tall enough series/profile to keep the overall rolling diameter the same as OEM and you'll be laughing.
It's Quattro weather right now in Toronto, as we just got hit with 10" or so and I'm still getting lake-effect here in Uxbridge. Getting another 6" on Sunday... I actually made up a reason to get in my car today (I work from home) to have some fun... Quattro+Blizzaks+manual tranny=FUN!
Anyway, good luck with the winter tire purchase, cheers.
Bookmarks