Originally Posted by
Popecok
Just wondering the big difference between the giac and the apr. according to the apr website the ecu brings our cars to 200hp and 243lb-ft. the giac delivers 40-50 hp and 50-80 ft-lbs gain which would bring to around the same hp but close 20ft-lbs less. everyone seems to have giac and not apr why?
Since nobody has said it yet, I'll beat the dead horse. I suggest the search button. It's your friend.
APR = relatively mild, but effective.
GIAC = one of, if not the most aggressive
Uni = same as GIAC.
CTapp = I don't know much about, but I hear good things (aggressive)
Eurodyne = Same as CTapp
Personally I don't like APR, power claims and power output vary by cars. The B5 S4's are a classic case of that. They have "freak" cars that make mad power, and are faster than cars with identical mods.
I buy stuff (performance parts, suspension, etc) based on customer service 90% of the time, the other 10% is due to shear function over form.
This is why I went with Unitronic, not APR. I thought about REVO, and APR, but I went elsewhere after doing my research.
How many 1.8T's with real turbos has APR tuned? Their Stg 3 kit comes with a GT28R, and last I checked they don't readily support bigger turbo tunes. Unitronic offers off the shelf tunes that can be tailored to your application based on your turbo and injectors. Take a look at some of the other forums, or the CAPS database.
APR software has to be removed from the ECM before it can be reflashed with another company's software. We had to do that for an S4 customer a couple months back(had to be sent to CA). The car had APR software, but felt pretty weak. We chipped it w/ GIAC, and he fell in love with his car again. We made a customer for life off that deal. I'm not sure if all the companies are like that, but I know they don't all need that.
Bookmarks