Originally Posted by
Todd/A.W.E.
Can you run a 28RS on a stock manifold? Yes. Is it optimized for compressor maps? No.
Todd,
Could you please explain the how it is and isn't optimized to the compressor maps?
The key difference between the 2560R (28R) and 2860R (28RS) is in the turbine. The two compressors are pretty similar, with a SLIGHT difference in trim (60 trim vs 62 trim)...with the 28RS having a little bigger inducer.
I have pushed the 28R to it's limits, and at the end of the day...it wasn't compressor that I ran out of, but rather I ran out of turbine (because it is a small 25 series wheel).
I want to be honest with you, with the 28R turbo on my car, I never really liked the car (has nothing to do with AWE's workmanship, which is excellent)...but rather, the car felt like a simple big K04 upgrade. But after the 28RS, the car never ran better. Unfortunately, with very aggressive timing along with our plastic rods on the AMB, the 28RS may be a bit too much for what the motor can handle.
I really don't know what you're trying to get at with your statement. I understand you want to sell kits that have the OEM driveability as well as reliability, so detuning the kit to meet these standards is obviously in AWE's company values. However, my question is: why detune a more inefficient turbo, when you can more effectively tune a MORE efficient turbo? All this timing is added to the 28R to give it it's low-mid range ramp up, but all that has done from my experience is stress the rods even more...which is why Ben snapped his rod NOT at full boost/torque, but rather at 3000-4000 in a high gear. You can accomplish the same by detuning a 28RS while laying off the timing curve in that range. I've broken rods personally, and have dealt with enough fellow AWE 28R kit owners to know what is causing the the issue. NONE of these guys are EVER breaking rods at high RPM's. I even had to help a local member tow his car and rip his motor apart to assess his damage, and the findings are almost identical.
So you are saying that the 28R is a better turbo? Or because the 28R turbo is a more economical turbo in cost (almost a $200 difference in cost between the two). As a business owner having to constantly budget costs to maximize margins, I can understand opting with more cost-effective solution...but please don't be calling me out telling me about the differences in compressor maps. I've ran your 28R-map-optimized file on a 28RS, 2871R, and even on a 3071R... and it works VERY well (with some tweeks of course). I can tell customers that a K03 is better than a K04 as well because the the compressor map mates better to stock software.
I have had nothing but respect for you guys, and think I've done my fair share for you guys. But I am also entitled to my own opinions, findings, and views. So chill out.
Cordially,
Jeff Lee
Bookmarks