Originally Posted by
b6onboost
^ what was the wheel hp/tq. maha may read low, but whatever conversion factor you used to calculate crank hp/tq sound too high. 245/313 is pretty much too high for the K03, even with all supporting mods.
I didn't use a correction factor; the machine did it for me.
It would be easier to just post the graph, but I can't figure how to do it on AZ (I'm used to AW) so I'll rattle off the numbers, so bear with me.
I dynoed the car as a baseline with just my Milltek on (ambient temp was ~80*). I returned 69 whp (162 corrected). Torque is listed at 164 ft/lbs; with no designation given between wheel and crank numbers.
I had the car chipped, drove around for a month, and had it dynoed again. This time the car had an AWE FMIC, Dahlback Stage 2 software and fuel injectors, and new, Bosch sparkplugs with a cooler heat range in addition to the Milltek CB (with stock cat FYI). I also had the fuel filter replaced that day. Ambient temp was ~83*. Three runs were performed, and the car made better power as each one progressed; there was maybe ~30-45s in between runs. The second and third runs were near identical. She threw down 181whp (244.8 corrected) and again, torque is listed as 312.8 ft/lbs, with no differentiation between wheel and crank.
So to sum up:
Stock: 69 whp (162 chp/164 ft/lbs)
Dahlback: 181 whp (~245 chp/ 313 ft/lbs)
The car feels worlds quicker. Is the K03 at the edge of its capacity? Yes, I don't doubt that for a second. Is this probably going to cause the K03 to die at some point? Yes, but when it does, I have bigger and better things planned. While the Dahlback stuff was expensive, it is worth it. I haven't had any CEL's or other associated boost issues, and I chalk that up to the fact that its TuV approved. Fuel economy isn't as good as it was, but I cause that problem
If you have any more questions please let me know.
Bookmarks