0-60 calculator

**Sleeeper X** · 09-17-2008 12:11 PM

Hey, I recently found a somewhat accurate 0-60 calculator based off you 1/8th mile time and speed.

http://www.wallaceracing.com/0-60_equation.php

So far mine is 3.01 :)

**oneohone** · 09-17-2008 12:36 PM

Pretty cool find.

School bus fully loaded = 47.325 seconds

**Don Supreme** · 09-17-2008 12:48 PM

Your 0 to 60 time is: 3.23

Not bad for an a little A4, eh?

**BurnAll4S4** · 09-17-2008 02:32 PM

apr ecux does this....new vagcom does this....

and youre 0-60 is not 3.01...not even close. its probably more like 4.01

**Das General** · 09-17-2008 04:57 PM

I'd be willing to be it was not 4.01

His car is faster than various other cars that are known to run sub 4 second 0-60. So what makes you think it would be slower? Especially, considering those cars have higher top ends, which would mean his low end speed is faster.

**audimeister** · 09-17-2008 05:09 PM

My car would be faster if it had an RS4 front bumper...

**BurnAll4S4** · 09-17-2008 06:45 PM

Originally Posted by deb38

I'd be willing to be it was not 4.01

His car is faster than various other cars that are known to run sub 4 second 0-60. So what makes you think it would be slower? Especially, considering those cars have higher top ends, which would mean his low end speed is faster.

my 11.2 run i logged i did 3.66 0-60

**S4tranquility** · 09-17-2008 08:08 PM

Originally Posted by BurnAll4S4

my 11.2 run i logged i did 3.66 0-60

Care to share the logs? I logged during a run where I cut a 1.6200 60 ft time and seem to recall the 0-60 was 3.5 sec with rollout (like most magazines do) and probably 3.7x with no rollout.

**Das General** · 09-17-2008 08:40 PM

Originally Posted by BurnAll4S4

my 11.2 run i logged i did 3.66 0-60

Ok, your point?

**S4tranquility** · 09-17-2008 08:53 PM

Originally Posted by deb38

Ok, your point?

I'd say his statement and mine illustrate that the calculators are worthless. Sub 3.5 would be really, really hard. I cut a 1.62 60' and didn't get it.

**Das General** · 09-17-2008 08:56 PM

Possibly. I am just saying that 4.01 is probably a little bit inaccurate considering the times and power that Tommys car has. Strictly pertaining to the fact that a 997tt or a new GTR can run sub 4's and Tommys car is in their power and speed range.

**Sleeeper X** · 09-17-2008 11:16 PM

Look, i didn't post this to be a bashing fest on me or anyone else. I posted it to be a handy little toy to play around with and I posted my 3.01 as a joke. I obviously know itsa few tenths of a second off, so please Mr "Burnall4s4" be negative somewhere else where else. After all its not my fault your cars forsale.