Originally Posted by
pzp107
This is actually a very simple flow calculation you would do in any freshmen thermodynamics class. You are increasing the volume of air traveling through the bi pipe. You are WRONG in saying that the throttle body and everything else is the same restriction which would net no increase in horsepower. If you want a an example like your garden hose problem think of the throttle body now acting to take the larger volume of air and increase velocity by forcing it through a smaller hole. This would in turn help feed high rpm power. This is a common principle opposite of a diffuser, guess what it is? You are right in saying a larger throttle body, manifold, porting etc would be beneficial. But thats about the extent of your correctness.
Uhhh, I don't know about "simple", but I know what you were getting at
Actually, you have forgotten the
other major component to the Q=V/A story... Velocity. By increasing the diameter you do increase flow, however, you also
decrease velocity (for a given temperature & pressure). This is all in a perfect world of course, but as we all know there many "real" world factors that can effect these values in either direction. Let's just suffice to say that the charged air supply entering the TB
may have more volume, but it's entering at a slower rate (unless the pressure is increased). And may I ask where the hell Double Nutz is at a time like this???
But to "Tipsy's" point, there is no denying that there is only so much the stock S4 heads can physically flow (per increment of time), based primarily on volumetric limitations and timing; the valves can only pass so much air before they close, indicating that flowable volume, smoothness, and architecture of the intake track play a critical role in the whole event. Then you have to contend turbulant flow, eddies, etc., etc. and then it get's really messy. I would venture to guess that Z-German engineers who designed this engine sized the bi-pipe within
marginal limits of the engine's flowable capacity (I'm also guessing that APR realized this also, hence their I.D. size is approx. stock too).
Therefore, it is entirely possible that genjdm has taken out some of this proverbial "fluff" in the system (at a particular engine speed, intake presure, temp., etc.), and provided another piece to the puzzle. Now my guess is that if Gregg threw a cam in there with a little longer intake duration, things would start to get interesting.
But as entertaining as this may be to "Tipsy", he does have some valid points. Although controversial, he is actually asking good questions that we should all be asking ourselves anyways. Otherwise, how else would we push the envelope gentlemen?
Bookmarks