I'll try to respond your points below (and by the way, if I'm wrong on anything as far as physics of air etc, please let me know)... Just for the record, I've been down this road before, and if you search around here and AW, and think you'll find all the evidence you need to show you that the stock airbox is superior in the A4 over any other known setup. I don't race, but I have experimented with the intake and logged data in the past. After all that, I'm not back to the stock setup, and for a reason. It's best.
Originally posted by A4Jon1.8t
But one thing is for sure, you will definatly move larger quantities of air with an aftermarket setup versus a stock restrictive air box.
Not really true in our cars, since our engines will never use massive quantities of air. The stock air box holds MORE than enough air for the 1.8 engine, and the air is quickly replaced by the snorkel (especially when you're driving). The stock airbox has NEVER been show to be restrictive in any test I've seen, even with the paper filter. Your 1.8 will never be deprived of the air it wants. (BTW - I think the stock box holds something like 5 liters of air). Also, the stock air box is designed to direct air flow to limit turbulence, and to break the air into streams for more accurate MAF readings (but this is the area where you know way more than me on

) - at least that's what has made sense to me, but let me know if that's off-base).
Never the less, all the air that is ingested into the engine comes from the intercooler, not the air box, as it would on a N/A engine. Have you ever felt your stock, plastic, air box after driving? I will guarantee you that it gets WAY hotter than a metal shielded intake. The heat from that plastic is naturally going to transfer into the air that is passing through the air box at a lesser quantity and slower, due to it's restrictive qualities.
The air in the box is quickly replaced, which means it does not heat up in there. Also, plastic is a very poor conducter of heat, so it is ideal for the airbox. Trust me, you can find plenty of data on this from people who have measured and logged the intake air temps. And many of the studies I saw were from people that do go to the track (unlike me).
Do you think that ANYONE who professionally races A4's has a stock air box sitting under their hood? I bet not.
Well, not many race the 1.8T, since it's not exactly ideal for that. But, the APR Stage III uses the stock airbox. So, wouldn't you think that the box certainly flows enough for a chipped K03? I believe one of the fastest Audis out there, the "Silver Bullet", uses an ITG cone filter, but it ENCLOSES the filters with carbon fiber canisters (see pic below), just like an airbox. Again this supports the argument that you do not want to suck in engine bay air, no matter what, it will always be warmer.
All that said, it's been proven that air flow is not a limiting factor in the 1.8. Rather, heat is the limiting factor, since the turbo and cat are right next to the intake. So, the best you can do is shield your intake from the engine bay air, and seal it off, so it can only pull air from outside.... which the stock air box is perfectly designed for!
For another study on this, see here:
http://www.autospeed.com/cms/article.html?&A=0646
"Hmm, so how much loss is there through the filter? Very nearly nothing at all! And guess what? That is the case on nearly every car - the standard filter poses very little restriction at all in the system.

Look at the Before Filter and After Filter lines - don't get much closer than that, do ya? In the Audi's case, the filter makes up 1 inch of water pressure drop out of the 32 inches total pressure drop that is present. In other words, 97 per cent of the flow restriction of the intake is not the filter. And to hammer home the point, when you make actual on-car measurements, it's pretty well always like this. The airfilter as a halitosis-suffering, smelly, dirty, hairy negative pressure is a total frame-up created by those with vested interests in selling drop-in aftermarket replacement filters."
Bookmarks