dramaticstatic
01-27-2006, 03:07 AM
Bit of a rant I wanted to put together after watching several episodes of Top Gear and Fifth Gear. Both tremebdous shows I might add.
What it is the huge obsession with top speed? It's even more pointless than the horsepower war. Honestly I'd rather whoop someone up to say 160-170, limited because of gearing, than have ultra high gears to hit huge speeds. Especially with the new tranny's out there that can shift in milliseconds, you could make a very close ratio gear box for huge acceleration at most any speed for a bit of sacrafice at the top end. It would be insanely cool if they even just offered this as an option. A small sports car manufacturer could try this one.
This all seems driven by water cooler racing culture.
The review of the new M5 and M6 particularly sparked this one.
Why in the world do they quote each car as being a 200 mph saloon car? Why? It's speed limited at 155 mph just like every other car from each of the other top 2 german auto makers. They shouldn't quote a speed unless you can pick the car up from the factory, turn the key, step on the gas, and hit that speed. They seem to quote these specs based on the bs press the company puts out and which flows better with the current review. For example, many quote the BMW M car top speed at 200 yet some have called AMG cars pointless because they only hit 155. Both cars have the same top speed as far as anyone is concerned.
Honestly, removing a limiter to hit a top speed really is along the same lines as changing tranny ratios or installing anything to inhance performance in the engine.
And if the top 3 german manufacturers entered into a gentelmen's agreement to limit the top speed to 155 from the factory, why don't the gear the trannys with a sensable ratio? Why is my manual B5 S4 tranmission geared to hit almost 190 mph when the car couldn't get anywhere near that first of all because of the speed limiter and then because of sheer lack of horsepower?
Even in a car that could pass the limiter, say an Audi S6, which I'm sure are geared to be able to hit near 200 mph if unlimited, why isn't the thing geared to a lower top speed to take advantage of a closer gear ratio and quicker acceleration?
Argh, that's all for now.
What it is the huge obsession with top speed? It's even more pointless than the horsepower war. Honestly I'd rather whoop someone up to say 160-170, limited because of gearing, than have ultra high gears to hit huge speeds. Especially with the new tranny's out there that can shift in milliseconds, you could make a very close ratio gear box for huge acceleration at most any speed for a bit of sacrafice at the top end. It would be insanely cool if they even just offered this as an option. A small sports car manufacturer could try this one.
This all seems driven by water cooler racing culture.
The review of the new M5 and M6 particularly sparked this one.
Why in the world do they quote each car as being a 200 mph saloon car? Why? It's speed limited at 155 mph just like every other car from each of the other top 2 german auto makers. They shouldn't quote a speed unless you can pick the car up from the factory, turn the key, step on the gas, and hit that speed. They seem to quote these specs based on the bs press the company puts out and which flows better with the current review. For example, many quote the BMW M car top speed at 200 yet some have called AMG cars pointless because they only hit 155. Both cars have the same top speed as far as anyone is concerned.
Honestly, removing a limiter to hit a top speed really is along the same lines as changing tranny ratios or installing anything to inhance performance in the engine.
And if the top 3 german manufacturers entered into a gentelmen's agreement to limit the top speed to 155 from the factory, why don't the gear the trannys with a sensable ratio? Why is my manual B5 S4 tranmission geared to hit almost 190 mph when the car couldn't get anywhere near that first of all because of the speed limiter and then because of sheer lack of horsepower?
Even in a car that could pass the limiter, say an Audi S6, which I'm sure are geared to be able to hit near 200 mph if unlimited, why isn't the thing geared to a lower top speed to take advantage of a closer gear ratio and quicker acceleration?
Argh, that's all for now.