View Full Version : H&R vs. Neuspeed opinions

01-18-2009, 09:24 AM
So looking to get race lowering springs in the next month or so and would like to know if there are any real differences between these two springs.

H&R race + Neuspeed race.

The only difference i know of myself is neuspeed is a little lower.
figure i might go with neuspeed cuz they are roughly $50 cheaper.


01-18-2009, 09:27 AM
I can't say that I've had both but the hr were pretty nice. I thought the hr were lower

01-18-2009, 09:29 AM
had H&R's on my honda, rode very nice.

01-18-2009, 11:48 AM
does anyone know if one is stiffer than the other or not??
anyone have the neuspeeds that can give their opinion?

01-18-2009, 11:51 AM
h&r coils ftw.

01-18-2009, 11:54 AM
ive got neuspeed race/Bilstein sport setup. Rides near stock (except for the obvious being lower), a tiny bit bouncier than stock. Best ride height for fixed springs IMO

Kronic Budz
01-18-2009, 01:54 PM
i would be safe and go h&r race. A more well known company IMO.

01-18-2009, 06:16 PM
i would be safe and go h&r race. A more well known company IMO.

Neuspeed is a very well known company also. They have been supplying Hondas and Toyotas with performance parts for ages.

I've personally used both. H&R Race springs currently on my A4 and I previously used Neuspeed Race springs on my Civic and the Neuspeed setup had a slightly harsher ride but not anything I would write home about. Used them on my daily driver for years.

To be honest, I wouldn't really recommend one over the other. Neuspeed and H&R both make a really solid product.

01-18-2009, 06:43 PM
I noticed that neuspeed has a different set of springs for the 2001 model over the other b5's.

is there really a difference in the 2001 suspension?? if so what?