7500ish is redline, it maintains 600, this is on a new dev file, and this was our baseline today. I am excited for the results so far. I hear 1.9Dyno fats and .90 dyno acceleration. My 2.3 Fats was done under 600WHP.
But overlay the graph against any other dyno; 530WTQ @ 4KRPM? Are you kidding me! Thats nuts! Awesome work!
Lol, that is nuts! I made like 360ish tq at 4k RPM. I'm curious to what FATS mine will run now.
Well it's even warmer today, but I'm pretty happy with the consistency and performance on the street. The IC's are also performing well considering back to back pulls.
That graph is the output of a Vbox. So it is GPS verified to do 60-130 in 5.7 seconds. Same with the Gs on the graph, they are calculated from how quickly the car is physically accelerating. You can't do a VBox run on the dyno because the car is stationary.
That graph is the output of a Vbox. So it is GPS verified to do 60-130 in 5.7 seconds. Same with the Gs on the graph, they are calculated from how quickly the car is physically accelerating. You can't do a VBox run on the dyno because the car is stationary.
Roger, never did the Vbox and didn't know this is the output, awesome and sick car, that's for sure.
does anyone have any idea what $ you are looking at in a built 3.0 like in this thread?? if i go bigger, this def will work its way into the equation. that is some nasty torque..
stage 3+ dyno-tuned by EPL
AWE smic, OEM RS6's, CM Fx850 twin
JHM ss, linkage, DTS, Devils Own Meth
034 anchors everywhere, custom 4" single
does anyone have any idea what $ you are looking at in a built 3.0 like in this thread?? if i go bigger, this def will work its way into the equation. that is some nasty torque..
with labor and everything its hard to do it RIGHT under 25k to be honest.
I posted this in my deleted 3L thread a long time ago. Here was an early dyno sample of my car against a fully built 996TT with Alpha 30 TiALS. Totally different platforms and almost identical curve.
Last edited by Burningcoals; 02-09-2012 at 03:04 PM.
Actually its a modded stock Gen2 IM, we plan on doing some cam, IM combinations, poissible, RS4, then modded RS4, 2.8 cams, RS4 cams, etc with back to back dyno.
Right now everything is the same on my car except the IM, should be on the dyno soon to see any gains over stock IM.
Goal is to keep the down low while extending up top.
Actually its a modded stock Gen2 IM, we plan on doing some cam, IM combinations, poissible, RS4, then modded RS4, 2.8 cams, RS4 cams, etc with back to back dyno.
Right now everything is the same on my car except the IM, should be on the dyno soon to see any gains over stock IM.
Goal is to keep the down low while extending up top.
Jason sent me pics it looks awesome. I might end up doing that for the silver car if it pays off for you. I left a set of phenolic spacers there. I am thinking about asking Jason to still run those and see what difference they make.
looks good.. that's quite an increase of volume.. I wasn't going to go that crazy with mine, but I'd like to hear yours or Jason's thoughts on the design
looks good.. that's quite an increase of volume.. I wasn't going to go that crazy with mine, but I'd like to hear yours or Jason's thoughts on the design
also interested to hear... I have a buddy of mine working on my stock 2000 IM tomorrow, increasing the volume as well but didnt plan to go this big... I ported inside of mine a bit and will be chopping/welding shortly
Bookmarks