Sear,
Great question too.
I know the guys that start to challenge the times are going to want to make sure the time that beats them are legit. No one wants to have there time be questioned and this will start to happen as time goes on. So I really want to set the president now.
1 yes, two time slips makes it a little more fraud proof. sakimano is right if you can make one fake slip you can make two. but its going to be twice as hard.
2 knowing that people can just make there own slip. It is strongly suggested and highly asked that if you do beat the best time that you go above and beyond to prove the legitimacy of the run. If you come to the site often and are going to attempt to be one of the fastest cars then you should be quite conscious of the responsibility to bare proof.
3 the best thing to do is to grab proof. Video and the corresponding time slip will be good enough for any of the spots but will become mandatory at some point in time for the top spots.
The current group is set and all verified. I have do doubt that the PES car was able to run the time it did.
However there was a situation where the PES car not too long ago went 12.97 @ and there was no time. This unforchunately will not go in the list. with out a full run info there is no data for me to put in and thus does not qualify.
So to sum it up
1 two slips for any average time or
2 one slip and a video. or if you only got one pas and no video
3 one slip and at least take a camera pic of your car at the track and the slip
4 if you have broken the top spot record You do need video.
Lets face it at this point going mid 12's is an event we all would like to share. So this is obviously a dual bonus
For me with all the issues and arguments about the dyno. Making this fool proof is best for us. I know its not fool proof but these things take lots of the possible questions about validity of a run and the time out of the equation













Reply With Quote

Bookmarks